I've got doubts

then you better resolve them soon

pope said evo is real lol

lol

So uh why did god give whales pelvic bones

why is structural element that is similar to another one but serves a similar purpose and does the job efficiently there.

https://youtu.be/jRU0FXcf76Q

Please somebody give me a somehow valid reason that evolution doesn’t exist

I want to argue

That article was stupid

How do you know the age of the fossils?

by which rock layer we find them in

How do you know the age of the rock layer?

by which fossils we find in them

__**SCRIPTURE ALONE**__

A Christian server with the ultimate mission of reaching people with the gospel while being a safe and friendly community for Christians first.

*WHAT WE OFFER*

⭐ Bible studies
⭐ Resources to assist you in learning about the bible
⭐ Prophetic news updates
⭐ Fellowship and general chat with friends
⭐ Everyone welcome with roles for atheists, agnostics, alternative beliefs etc
⭐ We don't ping
⭐ Active most of the time
⭐ Weekly polls
⭐ Christian reddit feed
⭐ Verse of the day
⭐ Reaction roles
⭐ Custom bots
⭐ Great emoji selection
⭐ KJV Audio Bible
⭐ Christian Radio

**Invite link:**
https://discord.gg/F9h6YBp

-----

paleontology

archaeology

astronomy

theoretical physics

Earth science

geology

am I missing one ?

@MelonWelon where's the scientific proof for evolution? It's obvious adaptation happens but a complete change from one species to another is not proven scientifically.

We have heaps of evidence for speciation (micro- and macroevolution); from the lab and the wild, embryology, hybridisation, morphology, fossil records, dna analysis, chromosomal changes...

Speciation is microevolution. not macroevolution. for which we have no evidence. we've never observed a bird produce a non-bird.

Macroevolution starts with speciation. It's hard to draw the line between micro and macro. Macro is basically an accumulation of micro over time

There is no scientific evidence to support that. it's an opinion

and you know it

I can send you a list of scientific peer reviewed papers on it, if you're interested?

only if they contain repeatable experiments where a bird turns into a non-bird. if it's paleontology data it's useless. it tells you nothing because it's not science. they cannot apply the scientific method. one has to dream up a story to explain it. science: directly observable, testable, repeatable, and falsifiable. if your papers meet those critieria then please attach the links. if not, you may as well print them out and use them for toilet paper

"Where a bird turns into a non-bird". Yea, that's not how science works. I believe you're talking about magic.. Palaeontology and palaeoecology are not useless, but ok, I mean, palaeontology is a scientific field after all. Try again
You want empirical evidence? Sure thing, here you go. Four links to start you off https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ele.12460, https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.12374, https://www.pnas.org/content/116/27/13440, https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/37/1/183/5570178

all microevolution (speciation/adaptation)

as expected

bcs macroevolution is impossible

paleontology is not a scientific field. they cannot apply the scientific method. they look at fossils

a fossil can't even tell you that if that organism even reproduced...

You didn't seem to read what I said, so let me repeat (no worries mate, you're good). Micro describes mechanisms that alter the frequencies of alleles (within species), yea? Macro describes patterns at a grand scale across vast time periods. The only difference is the timescale involved. Cool? Btw, what do you mean by "they cannot apply the scientific method"?