Yeah ignore me dude that'll prove your point

That says at the top “written in 1995” and goes on to talk about the 9/11 terrorist attacks

@Deleted User Can you give me the references that claim for it to be in the middle ages?

@Deleted User show me this paper

Yes, it’s in the article you posted and I’ve pasted it about 5 times

So given the situation I stated

When was that piece of paper written?

I can add a layer to make it more apropos:

@Deleted User You haven't given me those references, come on.

A piece of paper says at the top “written in 1995” and goes on to talk about the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Then someone gives it you today and says “I found this, it was written in 1995”

When was it written?

What’s the date range?

You said that there was references saying it was written and created in the middle ages, back up your claim instead of giving useless analogies.

**crickets**

how long did it take to write the full zohar

We’ll get there, I need you to answer the question first

It was created by a 2nd century AD rabbi, I don't KNOW how much time it took but it was passed down generation by generation.

I’ve already provided the quote for you, if you don’t want to scroll up you can answer my question

I asked you a question, why are you afraid to answer it? That’s two questions now your ignored

It was written in the Middle Ages

I backed up my claim

Answer the question- you have not backed your claim

Your sources disprove your own claim

Back up your claim and give me the references that says it was created in the middle ages.

Now I’m happy to respond, but you’ve ignored 2 of my questions

As soon as you answer them, I’ll answer yours

*crickets*

Are you not gonna provide a source or citation backing your claim like I did?

Yep, as soon as you answer my questions I’ll happily answer yours

So no?

Gotta have a little give and take here

Yep! As soon as you answer my questions

Happy to answer yours

But I’m not just going to be interrogated, gotta have some give and take

What a time killer, thought I could learn something new

Yep, happy to do so!

Now are you capable of answering my questions?

What are you afraid of exactly?

Not gonna hurt a bit I promise

Welp, guess he gave up.

In summary:

The Talmud was written in late antiquity

The Zohar was written in the Middle Ages

The Zohar references a round earth, but is not even close to the first document to do so.

Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

Now I’m out, dm me if you want to revisit anything.

like i said waaay up there, a lot of our accepted "science" comes from mystic texts like the zohar and kaballah

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shimon_bar_Yochai ''with the authorship of the Zohar, the chief work of Kabbalah.'' @Deleted User Hopefully this is easier to understand for you

''was a 2nd-century tannaitic sage'' not Middle Ages

Mkay honey, so can you answer my questions?

Because you’re wrong, according to your own sources

But if you’re right, then answering my questions won’t even hurt your argument at all

So happy to give citations, just as soon as you answer my questions

Since I’ve answered all of yours

Surely anyone debating in good faith wouldn’t have a problem answering a couple questions

In the meantime: to reiterate

As has been proven, the Zohar was written in the Middle Ages.

You're trying to commit a red herring fallacy, a question which has nothing to do with my claim.

Despite what flimsy circumstantial evidence you build together

Lol there’s no fallacy here

I asked you what the point you’re trying to prove is

How is that a fallacy?

I've provided you 3 sources, I'm still waiting on you for 1.

And the other is a simple hypothetical

Both your initial sources support my claim

Answer the question and I’ll give you exact quotes from them.

A piece of paper says at the top “written in 1995” and goes on to talk about the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Then someone gives it you today and says “I found this, it was written in 1995” what is the date range for which the document was written?

Thats one question, the other is:

What is the hypothesis you’re trying to prove?

Your refusal to answer these questions speaks volumes

You’re just trolling, not actually debating

Here's what happens '' A rabbi in the 2nd century AD writes his book and completes it, passes it down by generation to generation. Finally, in the 16th century, a person by the name of Moses Deleon Publishes the works and ascribes it to the original rabbi. Who created the book? ''

So you’re refusing to answer either question, and instead providing me with an additional question?

I’ll answer your questions as soon as you answer mine

In a debate there has to be a little give and take

So you don't care about learning huh, enough waste of time for me. I will be studying, once you come with a logical claim and have a source with citation to back it up message me back.

As soon as you’re willing to debate in good faith I’m happy to do so

I asked you 2 totally fair and legitimate questions that you can answer in good faith without hurting your argument, and you have continuously refused to answer them

Anyone who isn’t just trolling would have absolutely no problem answering my questions

You're confusing publishing date to creation.

One of which is literally “what is your hypothesis”

You’re confusing apocrypha with reality

As soon as you’re willing to have a debate in good faith I’m happy to continue

But I’m not answering any more questions until you answer mine- debates need give and take

But otherwise, we can agree with your sources that the Zohar is a middle age document

So much wasting of a good brain.

<:uh_duhh:583617741684998154>

@Deleted User you like Minecraft?

No the earth is flat in it and it upsets me

Jk

I don’t really play Minecraft, but I play a bunch of other stuff, dm me if you’re looking for ppl to play with ad we can see if we have any of the same games

rocket league is fun

~~im addicted to it~~

@Deleted User what’s a Semite

What do you call someone who is hostile or prejudice against blacks or whites

a racist

thats what you call someone prejudiced against another person for racial reasons

No its isnt

what _do_ you call them then