Is there an example of a large object being forced into a spherical shape due to its mass anywhere?

Cant show an experiment. Just a belief system.

@numbynumb pseudoscience then

speculative mathematical model idolatry

@Deleted User you sound like vsauce

http://www.thestargarden.co.uk/Newtons-theory-of-gravity.html

no substantial evidence that mass attracts mass

Yeah, we are aware of the theory of gravity

Yeah. It’s called earth.

lol

we dont know why things fall toward the earth. the idea that it's the earth's mass which causes things to fall requires substantiation.

No. It’s proven. Gravity is the reason why. Gravity has diverged in different ways. There are zero gravity airplane rides for example.

Been broken*

Los how do you explain pictures of the earth before photoshop or complex@computers?

Or*

Come into the discord microphone we can talk

Why do you also have a red pill thing

Chatroom*

Zero gravity planes only demonstrate that things fall at a constant rate, not the cause of that falling.

Pictures were faked in darkroom "photoshops" before the means of digital manipulation.

Also sophisticated miniatures & special effects have been employed in the space program from its inception.

"Douglas Trumbull, the industry pioneer behind the special effects of 2001: A Space Odyssey, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and Blade Runner joins post-secondary students and faculty to discuss his remarkable career in visual effects and his own directorial projects.This Higher Learning event was held on December 9, 2010 at TIFF Bell Lightbox." https://youtu.be/FBaZQojd1_s

This guy worked for NASA before being hired by Stanley Kubrick to create special effects for 2001. He describes all of this and the means by which NASA faked its early missions in the video above.

First, do you have any proof that the moon landing was take in a darkroom? Also, specifically affects haven’t been used or were in its infancy at that time. 3 point on zero gravity planes: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travel-truths/how-do-zero-gravity-planes-work-parabolic-flights/amp/

Do you have any proof that it wasn't?

https://incredible-adventures.com/zero-g-how.html

Zero g planes aren't evidence that mass attracts mass. I already accept that things fall at 9.8m/s/s

It’s evidence about the breaking of gravity. I also provided expirements Newton did himself.

Newton himself acknowledge that he didn't know what the cause of gravitation was.

Also you’re saying that NASA’s annual budget was all for nothing?

So?

That doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen.

Do you you know what strong force is?

If NASA was willing to lie about their missions, obviously they would also be willing to lie about their budget.

In an atom was keeps the protons together is strong force in an atom. We don’t exactly know why it happens. But, it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

Their budget report is not a strong argument to support the reality of their missions.

That’s not my only argument. It was a point. Also IT would have been congress who was creating the funding that lies not NASA.

If it was true. Which it isn’t.

That's true, we don't know why atoms stay together. I already said I agree that things fall at the rate Newton measured. But only if it's caused by mass attracting mass would object tend toward sphericity - that's what this argument was originally about.

You don't know for a fact whether it's true or not.

It's a claim that isn't easy to prove or disprove. Personally, I am highly skeptical of it.

Nope. My argument was that matter as it gets bigger will be forced into a physical shape due to the force of gravity forcing it into that shape.

Also who is agent smith

I keep seeing that.

Why would the fact that things fall on earth force objects into spherical shapes?

agent smith is a bot

It’s kinda a long explanation so here: https://theconversation.com/amp/curious-kids-why-is-the-earth-round-80311

Do you really think I'm simply unaware of basic physics?

The point is that you're simply taking experts' word for it rather than demanding tangible and reproducible evidence.

Reproducible evidence? It’s been reproduced thousands of times with each of our planets in our solar system. Also, what better explanation do you have?

No it hasn't. You are assuming that the movement of the "planets" is caused by the same force that causes things to fall on earth.

That's where the evidence is lacking.

I dont have a better explanation. But my lack of a better explanation is not proof that your speculative mathematics provide one.

I think that the "experiment" used to derive the gravitational constant is bogus.

Without solid evidence of "Big G", the heliocentric model is merely speculative.

I’m not asumimg it. It has been proven. We are able to measure the gravitation lull and orbit around objects. These equations have been created by newton himself.

Pull*

I gtg to bed

I’m tired

I’ll see y’all tomorrow

The equations are not proof. You have to include a large number of assumptions to arrive at those conclusions.

bye

equations are not proof. obviously. what makes you think I dont understand the equations?

The American School system is garbage and needs a complete overhaul

why?

many obvious reasons

patriotism, fake history, multiple choice tests

there is no such thing as fake history

history is history

its already proven

sorry mate @shiro

lol

do you believe everything thats in the news as well? @MagicalLuuk

no

ur weck

then why do you assume the news in the past were correct?

stupidity

no

sorry

mate thats not how it works

how come?

example: 911 was a lie. it was shown in tv therefore ppl believe it and thats why it will be in the future history books. now how can you be sure stuff like that or similar never happened before?

9/11 was not a lie

My uncle was at the scene

Or one of my uncles

And he was nearly killed

One of the funnier things ive seen lately

@patrickcooper289 what if i tell you...it can be a lie.. **but many people died anyway**

@MagicalLuuk no explanation? sad

the school system is bad tho tbf

https://youtu.be/bHBaYUkrtIs

<#484514023698726912>

<:trolled:555217274907262976>

Gay Frogs- By Alex Jones
https://youtu.be/wkQcfkxWAZg

yes

It is good, lol

A classic

a modern masterpiece