Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 560658227293978634
speculative mathematical model idolatry
@Deleted User you sound like vsauce
no substantial evidence that mass attracts mass
Yeah, we are aware of the theory of gravity
Yeah. It’s called earth.
lol
we dont know why things fall toward the earth. the idea that it's the earth's mass which causes things to fall requires substantiation.
No. It’s proven. Gravity is the reason why. Gravity has diverged in different ways. There are zero gravity airplane rides for example.
Been broken*
Los how do you explain pictures of the earth before photoshop or complex@computers?
Or*
Come into the discord microphone we can talk
Why do you also have a red pill thing
Chatroom*
Zero gravity planes only demonstrate that things fall at a constant rate, not the cause of that falling.
Pictures were faked in darkroom "photoshops" before the means of digital manipulation.
Also sophisticated miniatures & special effects have been employed in the space program from its inception.
"Douglas Trumbull, the industry pioneer behind the special effects of 2001: A Space Odyssey, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and Blade Runner joins post-secondary students and faculty to discuss his remarkable career in visual effects and his own directorial projects.This Higher Learning event was held on December 9, 2010 at TIFF Bell Lightbox." https://youtu.be/FBaZQojd1_s
This guy worked for NASA before being hired by Stanley Kubrick to create special effects for 2001. He describes all of this and the means by which NASA faked its early missions in the video above.
First, do you have any proof that the moon landing was take in a darkroom? Also, specifically affects haven’t been used or were in its infancy at that time. 3 point on zero gravity planes: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travel-truths/how-do-zero-gravity-planes-work-parabolic-flights/amp/
Do you have any proof that it wasn't?
Zero g planes aren't evidence that mass attracts mass. I already accept that things fall at 9.8m/s/s
It’s evidence about the breaking of gravity. I also provided expirements Newton did himself.
Newton himself acknowledge that he didn't know what the cause of gravitation was.
Also you’re saying that NASA’s annual budget was all for nothing?
So?
That doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen.
Do you you know what strong force is?
If NASA was willing to lie about their missions, obviously they would also be willing to lie about their budget.
In an atom was keeps the protons together is strong force in an atom. We don’t exactly know why it happens. But, it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
Their budget report is not a strong argument to support the reality of their missions.
That’s not my only argument. It was a point. Also IT would have been congress who was creating the funding that lies not NASA.
If it was true. Which it isn’t.
That's true, we don't know why atoms stay together. I already said I agree that things fall at the rate Newton measured. But only if it's caused by mass attracting mass would object tend toward sphericity - that's what this argument was originally about.
You don't know for a fact whether it's true or not.
It's a claim that isn't easy to prove or disprove. Personally, I am highly skeptical of it.
Nope. My argument was that matter as it gets bigger will be forced into a physical shape due to the force of gravity forcing it into that shape.
Also who is agent smith
I keep seeing that.