Message from @numbynumb

Discord ID: 560652492019466255


2019-03-28 02:24:15 UTC  

1. He hired someone to find it for him. 2. Is he wrong? 4/5. Not relevant to the expirament

2019-03-28 02:26:13 UTC  

Lol

2019-03-28 02:26:22 UTC  

2000 year old myth

2019-03-28 02:26:30 UTC  

That works on a flat earth

2019-03-28 02:26:36 UTC  

😂

2019-03-28 02:27:03 UTC  

Eratosthenes is the dumbest globe proof ever

2019-03-28 02:27:09 UTC  

Just because it’s 2000 years old doesn’t make is wrong

2019-03-28 02:29:41 UTC  

Also there are other recent reasons why. The discovery of gravity had led to people finding out why large objects are forced into a spherical shape due to there mass.

2019-03-28 02:30:19 UTC  

K show me the experiment for that

2019-03-28 02:30:27 UTC  

More pseudoscience

2019-03-28 02:30:30 UTC  

Lol

2019-03-28 02:30:39 UTC  

Is there an example of a large object being forced into a spherical shape due to its mass anywhere?

2019-03-28 02:30:46 UTC  

Cant show an experiment. Just a belief system.

2019-03-28 02:30:59 UTC  

@numbynumb pseudoscience then

2019-03-28 02:31:33 UTC  

speculative mathematical model idolatry

2019-03-28 02:31:36 UTC  

@Deleted User you sound like vsauce

2019-03-28 02:32:29 UTC  

no substantial evidence that mass attracts mass

2019-03-28 02:32:37 UTC  

Yeah, we are aware of the theory of gravity

2019-03-28 02:32:46 UTC  

Yeah. It’s called earth.

2019-03-28 02:32:50 UTC  

lol

2019-03-28 02:33:34 UTC  

we dont know why things fall toward the earth. the idea that it's the earth's mass which causes things to fall requires substantiation.

2019-03-28 02:35:03 UTC  

No. It’s proven. Gravity is the reason why. Gravity has diverged in different ways. There are zero gravity airplane rides for example.

2019-03-28 02:35:23 UTC  

Been broken*

2019-03-28 02:36:07 UTC  

Los how do you explain pictures of the earth before photoshop or complex@computers?

2019-03-28 02:36:09 UTC  

Or*

2019-03-28 02:40:50 UTC  

Come into the discord microphone we can talk

2019-03-28 02:41:54 UTC  

Why do you also have a red pill thing

2019-03-28 02:41:59 UTC  

Chatroom*

2019-03-28 02:44:59 UTC  

Zero gravity planes only demonstrate that things fall at a constant rate, not the cause of that falling.

2019-03-28 02:45:57 UTC  

Pictures were faked in darkroom "photoshops" before the means of digital manipulation.

2019-03-28 02:46:47 UTC  

Also sophisticated miniatures & special effects have been employed in the space program from its inception.

2019-03-28 02:47:51 UTC  

"Douglas Trumbull, the industry pioneer behind the special effects of 2001: A Space Odyssey, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and Blade Runner joins post-secondary students and faculty to discuss his remarkable career in visual effects and his own directorial projects.This Higher Learning event was held on December 9, 2010 at TIFF Bell Lightbox." https://youtu.be/FBaZQojd1_s

2019-03-28 02:49:18 UTC  

This guy worked for NASA before being hired by Stanley Kubrick to create special effects for 2001. He describes all of this and the means by which NASA faked its early missions in the video above.

2019-03-28 02:55:37 UTC  

First, do you have any proof that the moon landing was take in a darkroom? Also, specifically affects haven’t been used or were in its infancy at that time. 3 point on zero gravity planes: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travel-truths/how-do-zero-gravity-planes-work-parabolic-flights/amp/

2019-03-28 02:57:09 UTC  

Do you have any proof that it wasn't?

2019-03-28 02:58:13 UTC  

Zero g planes aren't evidence that mass attracts mass. I already accept that things fall at 9.8m/s/s

2019-03-28 02:59:11 UTC  

It’s evidence about the breaking of gravity. I also provided expirements Newton did himself.

2019-03-28 02:59:52 UTC  

Newton himself acknowledge that he didn't know what the cause of gravitation was.

2019-03-28 03:00:05 UTC  

Also you’re saying that NASA’s annual budget was all for nothing?