lounge
Discord ID: 484514023698726912
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 981/4068
| Next
try some mor emath it will prove moon baloons
@noah Bullshit. You base this assertion on what?
you had a 1 hour tirade about how moon ballons are real
and made magic math
now you cant remember
@๐The Mad Philosopher๐ THE FACT HE HAS A SPONSOR IN THE BACKGROUND
are you handicapped?
And so you don't even bother to look at the information because of your presumptions? @noah
What fucking logic is that?
or really high?
He claimed he could heal someone who had a liver disease with chiropracty
Heyo
lmao
It's not presumptions, that person is not a credible source of information.
hes sponsored by a alternative health company
Prove that he is one
uh oh
they dont think mad philospher
Look at the fucking information
you have to be kidding me if he isnt gonna promote their garbage
how are we not thinking
all they do is parrot what they been told
we are literally telling you ways of why this isn't credible
Philosopher you can't just say look at the information
@๐The Mad Philosopher๐ he has a very clear conflict of interest
thats why there on vaxxes now
Especially when the information does not come from a valid source
we had a look
and hes getting paid to say that
quick moon baloons switch subject
all they have is goal post moving
Fuck who's presenting it, look at the fucking information. I have to deal with NASA bullshit to satisfy you globe earthers nonsensical rubbish, so do you.
Maybe because Nasa is credible
๐ค
yes
Bullshit
moon baloons are real
You don't do that with NASA
nasa isnt the only space agency
NASA is far from credible
we got another space tin foil moon band aid believer
lmao
I AM PRO GUN.. and 2nd Amendment prove me wrong
How
Isn't nasa credible
I can do that with whatever I want
That doctor is not credible, provide some evidence that he is
@!GPT go see what a wipple shield is thats why they coat it in tin foil
you think moon balloons are credible
lmao
another one
hahahahahah
NASA is not credible. Provide some evidence they are
if i find the dsm or something somewhere is that a credible source for you guys?
Maybe the advancements in science
They provided
See? I can do that, too.
You know...
one time I wore a sweater
then my father wore it better
It was blue, with a purple dinosaur,
and then he hit me, now I am sore,
then he said,
"IM A PURPLE FU*!?IN DINOSAUR"
Dodge, dodge, dodge.
My mother works with NASA as a contractor. I can tell you that she and everybody she works with is more than qualified
space band aids and space tin foil rockets
thats a rcs nozzle
this is your proof
lol
and moon balloons
what u smoking
Don't look at information or evidence. Just dodge, dodge, dodge.
insulation and whipple shielding
yes totally
dont forge tthe space tape
for the tin foil moon rockets
@noah I Don't believe you or your momma.
its crucial SCIENCE!
Philosopher you can't just keep saying Im dodging when I've literally answered everything you've presented
@๐The Mad Philosopher๐ now listen here i said he has a very clear conflict of interest you have to wearing horse blinkers if that doesnt show up for you
But can YOU provide any SOLID evidence that NASA isn't credible?
You can't prove shit with your mommy's career
Or is it just pictures of weird looking equipment
space gaps
space gaps space tin foil moon tape and space band aids and moon ballloons
Do you know what those even are
you guys are funny
ALright then Philosopher where is your proof that they aren't credible. NO dodging now.
noah.. NASA is 100% compartmentalized bro
@tripolarbear I still look at the information. That's what being unbiased is like. Looking at information, regardless. Looks like that shows something about you.
no what the person next to him actually does
lmao nasa fan bois arguieng moon balloons and space tin foil is real
I laugh everytime
please keep going
I mean if I pulled out the inside of a computer it'd look wonky but that doesn't prove its fake
im dying
What does them being compartmentalized have to do with anything?
@๐The Mad Philosopher๐ im gonna go out on a limb and say you dont read medical journals
@noah I never said anything about credibility. I don't appeal to credibility fallacy.
I laugh when people don't provide any evidence besides pictures of things that look a bit off ๐ค
Lmao
guys remember space gaps in the hull are crucial for moon landing
It's not a fallacy. You need to provide some sort of ethos
it helps equalize the pressure of a complete vaccuum
thats SCIENCE!
I read more than you know
I like how I continue to ask for solid evidence but you continue to post pictures of weird looking equipment
oh
What do you read
is that a statement or a reply?
you mean pictures of nasa documented moon landers
because if thats a reply you only deserce equally stupid statements
yes that is your nasa how can you deny it
its your gospol
Philosopher so far you have done nothing more than post sources that either do nothing to prove you or are from someone who doesn't know what they are talking about.
gospol
I mean if you'd actually post evidence of WHY ITS FAKE then I'd debate you
still waiting for you to give me the math for spac emoon ballloons
But at this point it's pointless because you refuse to
You have only shown other's thoughts without giving any reasoning of your own
to be frank i dont care what nasa is doing im going for rocketlabs
@noah Appealing to anything or anyone thinking they have some sort of authority or credibility in anything is a fallacy and there is no getting around that. Look at information, regardless who it's from or you can never claim to be unbiased.
lets go kiwi space program
I'm still waiting for you to give evidence that they're fake
How
But go on I guess
Kek
Where does the information come from Philosopher?
How do we get it?
they do make some pretty cool centrifuges
I wouldn't trust a dunkin donuts employee if he lectured me on how the earth is flat
In general i mean
Because he isn't credible
@noah he finds it after skimming through pages of search results
space tape is bette rif its red
Krispy Cremes are much better
I just mean how do people obtain information in the first place?
Damn right
>another picture
okay yeah is is a pointless
๐ <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>
If the only thing you have is pictures
i appreciate u
go ahead quote some equation
it proves nasa doesnt lie
Only if you prove to me that it's valid to suspect they do lie, besides just pictures.
How would an equation debunk a photo
if I can only prove the tempature of bullshit on uranus then I can make nasa real
๐ค
Then I'll say something
if only
@noah ***I DO NOT GIVE A FUCK WHERE ANY INFORMATION COMES FROM!!***
I will look at information, regardless because that's what **UNBIASED** people do.
hmm no filter for you guys?
Because you've done nothing to establish your argument, yet ask for mine.
when all I get are pictures
Doesn't the source of that information matter though?
pictures are good for simple arguments
hahahaha that's what Christopher Columbus believed, not a major organization.
For example if I did a faulty experiment, doesn't that matter?
tri bear... best you chill and leave the Mods alone
eh
I mean technically he's the one being forced to be chill while the mods are allowed to insult us as much as they want
Void
Giving a fuck about credibility or sources means nothing other than you appeal to many fallacies. Look at the information and corroborate, analyze, or test the information for validity.
they dont seem to get out much and interact with people or they would have different conclusions
you do realize columbus sailed to prove it didnt have an edge
yes YES correct Cinder
it was the opposite
but nice try
In other words make sure that the information that you obtain is credible?
I meant that he sailed the earth because he believed the earth was pair shaped
you guys think moon balloons are real
Or at least shaped weirdly, if I remember correctly
wtf is a moon balloon anyways
i highly doubt you knwo what is a good source or not
we havent said anything about moon ballons
Also, have you validated any of the "evidence" that you have provided
thats you
I mean, I don't think you know any, since you've failed to provide them
@noah If You did a faulty experiment, I would point it out. Not dismiss you, immediately. I guess that's the difference between you and I. I give everyone a chance.
I am Loooking for an IDIOT to mute before dinner... any VOLUNTEERS?
you cant even notice moon baloons are bullshit cause its from nasa
but somehow you can judge good info
forgive me if I LUL
I mean I've never said my stance on the argument
assuming all globe earthers are idiots nice
Besides "provide evidence"
thats a majority of society
And Christopher Colombus
But whatever
pretty much they are tripolar
defends tin foil rockets cause nasa told em its real
I'm not saying don't give people a chance, but when that person DOESN'T KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT, there is no reason for me to believe them.
but can somehow know whats good info
Christopher Columbus didn't do shit
lmao
omg
Hahaha it's like he has me muted it something
this is hilarious
LULZ
Literally done nothing that I've said since I started talking to him
so do you guys really believe that you are the top 0.01 percent of society that is smart enough to see through everything
go ahead defend space moon band aids
and tell us how you know whats good sources
i wanna hear that again
@noah And how would You know if he knows what he's talking about if you don't listen to what he says, hmm?
i need another lol
I never said anything about sources
You wouldn't
I asked YOU for them
You can't
You don't
And all you do is do ad hominem instead of debating
go ahead
go say this rubbish to someone in real life and see where it gets you
admit space moon band aids are crucial to moon landi9ng
Because I have heard him before and I know that he is nothing more than a fraud trying to pawn off some bs instead of giving sound medical advice
cause nasa said so
and tell us how you know what a good source is
go ahead
i need to laugh hard
Literally said none of these things or claimed any of these things
you are assuming thats a band aid
I HAVE looked into that person I know he doesn't know what he is talking about
Still waiting on sources from you
Because they studied and maybe have an actual degree?
Rather than some self proclaimed genius
On why NASA isn't reliable or truthful
so arguements of authority is now the goal post
but I won't get that
do you ever just think
or is it just goal post moving
@noah Stop being a presumptuous little shit and watch the videos or concede you are being deliberately ignorant to avoid analyzing evidence.
*arguments of authority*
*asking you to present evidence against the authority*
okay buddy
@๐The Mad Philosopher๐ he did
you went from word of auhtority
When?
to degrees
Why would I trust this person about something that he has shown that he doesn't know anything about?
That was me
@tripolarbear Did not
and i find it really weak that you are using foul language to try and win a point
when does thinking take place
You asked about credibility and I provided an answer
Again, not answering my questions
Hows that shifting goal posts
Not doing anything I ask.
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 981/4068
| Next