Please don't melt my ice wall

first of all, 2,3,4, is note ven a pythagorean triple

@Norman please do not be anti-server

the sun when it stops will melt it

my typing is decaying already

u obviously arent seeing the point so ill just take my mercy elsewhere.

i wanna be tracer

just remember

no shadow opposite the sun

I love how all of the members here are called seeker of truth, or woke man. Lmao did you guys ever go into a physics class?

no shadow of the earth therefore

I am not seeing the point because there's no connection

what about widowmaker

Yeah...

I don't see it.

shadow of the earth upon what

And even then, It's coming in too fast.

And it's....well...

@Sheep of HAZeus shadow of the earth upon what

>no shadow of the earth

??? where do you want to see a shadow

I don't fuck**g know

the shadow of the earth if its eclipsing the once illuminated full moon right around that darkness funnel blip of reconvergence should be visible relative to that illumination zone in the sky

but its not its flush

its fully illuminated

@indio007 HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA you're the guy who always comes up with excuses for my experiments

That made no sense

meaning light is just reconverging. the shadow of the earth is not blocking the light of the sun

because the sun is inside of the earth

@Norman same here

dont argue with flattards they aren't worth it

The shadow of the earth is not blocking the light of the sun

I'm guessing most of you guys don't believe in vaccines either?

Wh

Since when does shadow block light

https://i.redd.it/dwehh9xzacr11.png

a shadow is made when something blocks light
not the other way around

diverging light from the sun lifting up parralel to the terminator reconverge opposite where it left from giving the illusion that the shadow of the earth is eclipsing the full moon if you beleive in heliocentrism. but its not. its just a darkness funnel caused by the radial reconvergence of light from the sun in the earth. bent back tulips of magnetic illuminative reconection.

duh im saying its not the shadow

no light is being blocked

Shadows is the lack of light. A shadow is cast when there is less photons in a particular space because of an object blocking it

its a reconvergence

hence there being no shadow in this picture

Alright, @CryingInGravity has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

for the billionth time

what does that prove, I really dont see anything but stars

no shadow. no blocking. only a reconvergence darkness funnel that the moon passes through

Umm....ok?

see that zodiacal band tracing the ecliptic?

shadow upon what... I really don't know where you expect a shadow

oh yes

Yes i see it.

i see it

o_o

people say its the shadow of the earth eclipsing the moon

im saying its not a shadow

the moon crosses through a reconvergence darkness funnel

the moon isn't even in view there

the moon is slower than the sun causing the phases

in this photo the moon is on the other side of thee arth

closer to the sun

Give up on concave, bro. It's flat.
A torus field naturally makes a flat disk, not a sphere or a concave plate.

when the moon is full is when its in that illumination zone

when its eclipsed its right in the middle of that illumination zone

Flat disk

Oh no.

2 madman.

the dielectric plane of inertia is not the flat earth for the billionth time

its what causes the doldrums

youve heard of that havent you flatty?

it causes the oscilation of the dipolar inner space

>the dielectric plane of inertia
let me... just analyze that

magnetism and inertia is about aether pressure not about infinite flat planes ascending forever

there is an equidistant capstone to all universal compression which polarizes the aether

Alright, @CryingInGravity has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

I must have said infinite, right?

...

Don't you dare condescend

Can you stop sending the same garbage over and over again?

it doesnt ascend forever is my point. bouyant objects stack. they stop at a certain point

because you live in the earth and there is an equidistant capstone.

the aether was disproved by the miechalelson-morly experiment

that is inside of the earth

no it wasnt

Who the hell said anything was ascending?

theres just no spin to the earth

thats all that proved

o_o

BRO!!!

Well....

without a dome your bouyant obejcts would keep ascending dude

The flat earth is non-rotating and stationary