Helium FLOATS because it is LESS DENSE than air

Also, Buoyancy has a correlation to Gravity, Correct?

Not in Archimedes Principle no

The Archimedes Principle is *about* buoyancy. Buoyancy has correlation with Gravity.

So, More Cherry-Picking?

WRONG archimedes principle dates back to ancient Greece, about 2000 years before Newton started saying "IF EARTH IS A BALL" ---> GRAVITY

You realize Science changes, Right?

Science is a METHOD

The same way we knew about Stars but we didn't know everything about them.

Cause and Efffect DOES NOT CHANGE

That doesn't mean they know the complete picture to *everything* about buoyancy.

It's not just a formula.

So why did Archimedes Principle work then WITHOUT ANY MENTION OF GRAVITY?

It's much, Much more.

Why do you think the objects falls on the water in the first place?

It worked then when it had *holes.*

Because they are less DENSE than air or less DENSE than water respectively

https://images-ext-2.discordapp.net/external/Wnjssimk55E8JrCiiJddOlU9IGDevhB9J31HYw5w_ic/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/359507646858002434/476729936523034624/ShotgunBallon.gif

That's called.. Convection?

I thought we learned this in like, 5th grade.

Something buoyant is usually a solid, Correct?

B'GAARRK I am good parrot B'GAAARK

Show me the EXPERIMENT please that shows

DELTA MASS

is

DELTA ACCELERATION

last time I will ask you

So, You think you're right because you're going against something you're taught? If I were taught 1 + 1 at birth then denied it I must be a genius, Right?

Of course not.

School doesnt teach that

^^

Im in college and they emphasize that smart people question actually authorities

Either show the experiment or STFU about your pseudoscientific monkey ball belief in "gravity"

Lol, Didn't I show you some already?

You didn't show SHIT

Buoyancy itself, General Relativity, I won't include theories, Actually.

Let's talk convection? A solid is denser than air so It.. Sinks?

It's a gas.

Ohhh in that case show me one cubic meter second of spacetime then please so I can use cause and effect scientific method experimentation on it

How come planets with little to no atmosphere have rubble on them still?

Are you saying the atmosphere is the explanation for things staying on the ground?

@Noodles General Relativity = Curvature of Space-Time....
Please present

```SPACE-TIME``` to me

Hey noodles are you sphere dude?

Yeah.

Cool Cool

How much do u know about physics

If I could explain it to you again, Everything is a theory. It just so happens to be that some theories make more sense than others. In your words, 'B'GAARRK I am a good parrot B'GAAARK'.

Did you say atmo-SPHERE? it's not SPHERICAL you reee ree @Noodles

https://youtu.be/6nNUEU8gnf4?t=279

Prove that's It's spherical?

@Human Sheeple why would a plane flying on a globe disturb a level?

WHAT THE?

A PLANE DOESN'T HAVE TO NOSE DIVE to go UP AND DOWN.

No @Noodles the scientific method has time and time again These are ABSOLUTE:

Scientists using The Scientific Method have PROVEN ...

1. Water boils at 212°F (100°C) at sea level (one atmosphere of pressure: 101.325 kPa or 14.7 psi).
2. Combustion is the result of Oxidation Reactions.
3. Information is ONLY caused by Intelligent Agency.
4. Lack of Insulin with Type 1 DM Patients results in Ketoacidosis (DKA).
5. Lack of Vit C intake in humans results in Scurvy.
6. Knowledge (or the Existence) of the 'Which-Path' Information Collapses The Wave Function.
7. The rapid motion and collisions of molecules with the walls of the container "CAUSES" Gas Pressure.
8. Magnetism is caused by the motion of Electric Charge.
9. The Coriolis Force is caused by two differing Frames of Reference: One Rotating Coordinate System (Non-Inertial) and One Non-Rotating Coordinate System (Inertial).
10. Gluconeogenesis results in the production of Glucose from specific Non-Carbohydrate Precursors.

These are ABSOLUTELY TRUE, PROVEN, INVIOLABLE, NEVER to be FALSIFIED !!!
Got another 500,000 or so, Interested?

Go back to collecting cans off the side of the road and storing them in your homeless tweaker shelter ok? 👍🏻

```everything is just a theory``` is FALSE

Some theories make so much sense that they are widely accepted.

Unlike the Flat Earth Theory.

Does this count as spam

Probably, He's posted it like, I think twice now.

@Noodles That is an ad populum fallacy, just because everybody THINKS that the Red Socks will win the next ball game, doesn't mean they will does it?

You can't even hold a civil argument without insulting me every three sentences so, Okay.

You see how GRAVITY is a toxic BELIEF and therefore part of a BAAL RELIGION

@Human Sheeple gravity has been proven in the same way

So, You're a flat earther because other people aren't, So that makes you 'smart'?

That is violating rule number 4 of the community guidelines

It's not a religion.

It's a *well accepted theory.*

Well, Not by you, At least!

@Noodles You are asserting PSEUDOSCIENCE when you say words you cannot prove with observable testable repeatable scientific method experimentation.

I DON'T accept your theory.

Well in the scientific community its more regarded as the truth

Rather than a theory

The same can be said for you, Lol.

So now we've established gravity is just a THEORY....


HOW CAN YOU HAVE GAS PRESSURE NEXT TO A VACUUM WITHOUT A CONTAINER

@Noodles ?

It's just that there is so much evidence proving me right.

@Human Sheeple hey punk the shape of the Earth is proven by the iss

I explained how the atmosphere is gradual and how that It's actually kind of repetitive, But, Since you don't listen to some 'Sciences' and only some 'Others', I'm going to say.. The 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics Is just a theory, Right?

Hey, Buddy, Prove it to me with an experiment.

No, Really! I want to actually see what you have to say, Since you apparently hold all the answers?

@Noodles Prove the sky is an atmo-SPHERE not an atmo-FLAT

No, Don't avoid my question.

Answer me.

01-page 12:
“aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over flat nonrotating earth”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf

02-page 108:
“aircraft flying over flat, nonrotating earth”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890005752.pdf

03-page 126:
“The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations sith stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth assumptions.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890007066.pdf

04-page 2:
“The method is limited, however, to application where a flat, nonrotating earth may be assumed. ”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720012071.pdf

05-page 11:
“The nonlinear equations of motion used in this model are general six-degree-of-freedom equations representing the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat nonrotating earth”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88248main_H-1777.pdf

06-page 32:
“Lastly, the equations of motion for the zeroth-order problem of flight in a vacuum over a flat Earth are presented.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940020279.pdf

07-page 2:
“In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat non-rotating earth ”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070030307.pdf
08-page 14:
“The earth is flat and non-rotating.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005472.pdf

oh god no

Wow, You are totally market DODGING my question.

Not cool?

FLAT NON ROTATING EARTH when developing
AIRCRAFT
or
ATMO-CRAFT
if you prefer

Noodles theres literally no point

Cool.

Thanks for trying, Though!

So you're basically saying no, You can't prove it?

Noodles its no use

Anyways, Thanks for insulting me along the way. I appreciate it. (I really don't, Though).

Of course I know It's no use.

Explain to me how GAS PRESSURE next to a VACUUM without a BARRIER

DOES NOT BREAK

```2nd law of thermodynamics``` @Noodles

They keep Gawking then repeating the same statements over and here, I don't really care anymore.

Yea u dont have to

Lol, You still didn't prove it.

I believe in the law but, According to you, It's just a theory.

I'm still open to ideas, Though.

@Noodles Please go into vc

Okay.

You don’t want to miss this.

may i add @Deleted User ?

add to the conversation^

Yes, you can.