Some theories make so much sense that they are widely accepted.

Unlike the Flat Earth Theory.

Does this count as spam

Probably, He's posted it like, I think twice now.

@Noodles That is an ad populum fallacy, just because everybody THINKS that the Red Socks will win the next ball game, doesn't mean they will does it?

You can't even hold a civil argument without insulting me every three sentences so, Okay.

You see how GRAVITY is a toxic BELIEF and therefore part of a BAAL RELIGION

@Human Sheeple gravity has been proven in the same way

So, You're a flat earther because other people aren't, So that makes you 'smart'?

That is violating rule number 4 of the community guidelines

It's not a religion.

It's a *well accepted theory.*

Well, Not by you, At least!

@Noodles You are asserting PSEUDOSCIENCE when you say words you cannot prove with observable testable repeatable scientific method experimentation.

I DON'T accept your theory.

Well in the scientific community its more regarded as the truth

Rather than a theory

The same can be said for you, Lol.

So now we've established gravity is just a THEORY....


HOW CAN YOU HAVE GAS PRESSURE NEXT TO A VACUUM WITHOUT A CONTAINER

@Noodles ?

It's just that there is so much evidence proving me right.

@Human Sheeple hey punk the shape of the Earth is proven by the iss

I explained how the atmosphere is gradual and how that It's actually kind of repetitive, But, Since you don't listen to some 'Sciences' and only some 'Others', I'm going to say.. The 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics Is just a theory, Right?

Hey, Buddy, Prove it to me with an experiment.

No, Really! I want to actually see what you have to say, Since you apparently hold all the answers?

@Noodles Prove the sky is an atmo-SPHERE not an atmo-FLAT

No, Don't avoid my question.

Answer me.

01-page 12:
“aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over flat nonrotating earth”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf

02-page 108:
“aircraft flying over flat, nonrotating earth”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890005752.pdf

03-page 126:
“The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations sith stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth assumptions.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890007066.pdf

04-page 2:
“The method is limited, however, to application where a flat, nonrotating earth may be assumed. ”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720012071.pdf

05-page 11:
“The nonlinear equations of motion used in this model are general six-degree-of-freedom equations representing the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat nonrotating earth”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88248main_H-1777.pdf

06-page 32:
“Lastly, the equations of motion for the zeroth-order problem of flight in a vacuum over a flat Earth are presented.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940020279.pdf

07-page 2:
“In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat non-rotating earth ”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070030307.pdf
08-page 14:
“The earth is flat and non-rotating.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005472.pdf

oh god no

Wow, You are totally market DODGING my question.

Not cool?

FLAT NON ROTATING EARTH when developing
AIRCRAFT
or
ATMO-CRAFT
if you prefer

Noodles theres literally no point

Cool.

Thanks for trying, Though!

So you're basically saying no, You can't prove it?

Noodles its no use

Anyways, Thanks for insulting me along the way. I appreciate it. (I really don't, Though).

Of course I know It's no use.

Explain to me how GAS PRESSURE next to a VACUUM without a BARRIER

DOES NOT BREAK

```2nd law of thermodynamics``` @Noodles

They keep Gawking then repeating the same statements over and here, I don't really care anymore.

Yea u dont have to