@Noodles Prove the sky is an atmo-SPHERE not an atmo-FLAT

No, Don't avoid my question.

Answer me.

01-page 12:
“aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over flat nonrotating earth”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf

02-page 108:
“aircraft flying over flat, nonrotating earth”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890005752.pdf

03-page 126:
“The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations sith stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth assumptions.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890007066.pdf

04-page 2:
“The method is limited, however, to application where a flat, nonrotating earth may be assumed. ”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720012071.pdf

05-page 11:
“The nonlinear equations of motion used in this model are general six-degree-of-freedom equations representing the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat nonrotating earth”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88248main_H-1777.pdf

06-page 32:
“Lastly, the equations of motion for the zeroth-order problem of flight in a vacuum over a flat Earth are presented.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940020279.pdf

07-page 2:
“In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat non-rotating earth ”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070030307.pdf
08-page 14:
“The earth is flat and non-rotating.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005472.pdf

oh god no

Wow, You are totally market DODGING my question.

Not cool?

FLAT NON ROTATING EARTH when developing
AIRCRAFT
or
ATMO-CRAFT
if you prefer

Noodles theres literally no point

Cool.

Thanks for trying, Though!

So you're basically saying no, You can't prove it?

Noodles its no use

Anyways, Thanks for insulting me along the way. I appreciate it. (I really don't, Though).

Of course I know It's no use.

Explain to me how GAS PRESSURE next to a VACUUM without a BARRIER

DOES NOT BREAK

```2nd law of thermodynamics``` @Noodles

They keep Gawking then repeating the same statements over and here, I don't really care anymore.

Yea u dont have to

Lol, You still didn't prove it.

I believe in the law but, According to you, It's just a theory.

I'm still open to ideas, Though.

@Noodles Please go into vc

Okay.

You don’t want to miss this.

may i add @Deleted User ?

add to the conversation^

Yes, you can.

Here we go again with GAS PRESSURE GRADIENTS

What comes first:

GAS PRESSURE

or

GAS PRESSURE GRADIENTS

how can you have 1 before you have 2.

Stupid crayon munching ball licking sun worshipping science denier.

YOU CAN'T HAVE GAS PRESSURE GRADIENTS BEFORE YOU HAVE GAS PRESSURE.

@Deleted User u can mention the book of job

So, You've been immature the whole time, And you clearly don't accept the various facts I've stated to you, And in fact, Insulted me several times because I have a different ideology than you.

I mentioned Job.

So no, I'm not even going to have a civil debate with you.

You can't even answer my question.

It's late.

Cool cool

Facts are based on SCIENTIFIC METHOD EXPERIMENTATION.....

You haven't scientifically validated

GRAVITY

or

GAS PRESSURE NEXT TO A VACUUM WITHOUT A CONTAINER

How do i talk in the vc?

Nor have you scientifically validated anything else.

Please, Stop.

Might I suggest going back to fixing the leak in your homeless camp shanty house?

Lol, You know you're losing the debate when you keep insulting them. Goodbye and good luck with stuff, Whatever it is you do!