general
Discord ID: 274262571367006208
250,991 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 656/2510
| Next
@TrashyGutenberg where?
Fl panhandle
Can i get travel from the UK included @TrashyGutenberg
Lol
Yes or no?
He needs to bang Louise mensch
I really need a graphic designer/general shop labor
congrats @Koba
General labor would be ok, art skills preferred
THANK YOU @queenarchitect
Mensch?
Oh
UK I think
I'm pretty sure she's UK
Yeah
Where in uk
London prob
Probably londonistan
She's a new
New*
Jew*
Reeee
Jew
She's trans jew
Vandal Nationalism?
It rustles me when people call goyim jews but she's so jewed I'm ok with it. Her husband is 2 1/2 megakikes.wav
She,s insane
she's actually psychologically unstable
she had an interview once where she talked about how she wrote articles and how stuff "just came to her" for her writing
aka she just makes shit up
PUNISHED MENSCH OUTPATIENT OCELOT A SCHIZOPHRENIC DENIED HER MEDICATION
Punished Bush A man denied his chemical weapons
Who dat THOT
Lol memory hole
๐
Scientists have found a way to tether HIV-fighting antibodies to immune cells, creating a cell population resistant to the virus. Their experiments under lab conditions show that these resistant cells can quickly replace diseased cells, potentially curing the disease in a person with HIV.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/64q2gc/scientists_have_found_a_way_to_tether_hivfighting/
Fuck
You guys
What do?
*Alt Right works with Mike Pence to cook up super GRIDS in effort to combat faggotry*
The Merchant Minute with the hysterical laughter in the background was the best shit ever
Anybody here got experience using STATA?
STATA or SATA?
Why not just use R if you're going to use STATA?
Using STATA instead of R is like using TACACS instead of RADIUS
@Nikephoros what do you need to use it for?
@Koba I mostly use R, but one class I take uses Sata
But basically I'm trying to interpret a Granger Causality test
Hmmm
Well I'd see if you can pirate it first
Stata is fucking expensive
Don't buy it if you aren't sure it can fulfill your needs
I've already done it.
I just need help interpreting the output
Do you know any classmates/professors that could help?
Professors would be best but if you're at a state college it might be difficult to get to them during office hours
My prof is hard to get to
And so many people in this class are very confused
Do you have a TA that's of any use?
Do you know anyone who's already taken the class and could help?
No TAs
Rip
TAs are usually useless anyway
From what I understand, It's very straightforward if you know what these outputs mean
Like does Prob > F = (#) mean Fail to reject or reject H0
@Nikephoros I have no idea, I haven't used R since I used python
Which I haven't done since python 2.7 came out
I know a guy who's premed who could help but I'm not sure I'll be able to get a hold of him
I have a friend at Case Western, I can shoot him a text and ask if he knows
So none of those outputs mean anything to you?
Lol not at the moment
Sorry, but I'll ask a couple of friends and see if they can help
ok the simplest way you can ask them is this: "Do these results indicate that I can reject H0?"
You know what, I think the decision rule is Reject H0 if "Prob > F" is greater than "F(#, #)"
Which appears to be true
@Koba Tell him this is the output to a Granger Causality Test
I did
He's a bit of an autiste so he takes a while to get his thoughts out
I see. I'm fairly certain that I can reject H0. Even if I don't know how to explain it using the data, the underlying question is: Is "egg" the cause of "Chicken"
The answer is, presumably, yes.
@Nikephoros I wish I could offer help. I used STATA for econometrics as well, but that was nearly 10 years ago.
I did my econometrics project on whether baseball player salaries are representative of objective output.
Spoiler alert, they aren't unless you time shift the pay by like 2 years IIRC.
@Nikephoros is the > an operator or just an output format?
@Koba I really don't know why its formatted "Prob > F", I think it might refer to a critical value of some sort.
Maybe not
Because I read that as "probability of f = .8903"
"Prob of chi2 = .8877"
There is nothing special about granger causality versus other hypothesis tests in stata.
250,991 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 656/2510
| Next