shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 317/856
| Next
It burns those places down faster.
Now its on Climate Change and the added P on LGBT ๐
Turns them into a public mockery.
And the public vaccinates itself.
Its a language learning Discord. I don't want to get banned =p
Oh.
Lets see how long I last though
Well that's unfortunate.
Coz I don't usually selfcensor
...
The conversation went in support of pedophilia
...
I'm scared
In what regard?
Actually molesting children or..
Something light, like not censoring shota and loli
Pedophilia means way too many different things.
I got called pedantic for this earlier, but it's like what the fuck. How can you not be when the charge is that serious.
Kids having sex with adults of any age
define to me "molesting"
Btw
๐
That.
That would be molestation.
I find the use of that word very... baity
Buh?
Taking physical advantage of someone.
That's what I call molesting.
One party doesn't know the implications or gravity of what they're doing. They're being taken advantage of. Ergo, molestation.
But then it is assumed that because of their age it is "always" "molesting". Which is also wrong
What if they know?
I think there are laws and good ideas.
It's a GOOD IDEA to halve your age, and then add 7, to know the minimum amount of years you should go.
And freeze at 18
... Well.
=p
That's where it gets completely stupid.
That's the law in my state.
But EVERY STATE ADJACENT TO ME
It's 16.
Wait.. thats actually the law?
Not even one year of difference. TWO YEARS.
Yes. It's arbitrary everywhere.
I always heard that as a saying
No one agrees on this shit. And yet every area brings the hammer down like you spat in the face of GAWD
Where do you live if you don't mind me asking?
I need to search for that
I do mind. s:
Kk, np
16 is acceptable imo
I think it depends entirely on the person to go even younger.
Nah.. kids should have their experiences with other kids
But it gets rarer and rarer quite quickly, you not molesting a person in that scenario.
"Molesting"
Prepubescent you're down to a 0% success rate of not-molestation.
I really don't get the use of that word
I fucking explained it. ๐จ
Amnesiac motherfugga
Age difference cannot equal to automatic "molesting"
Molesting has to be against their will
Or if manipulation was involved
It should not be assumed
That's why I defined it the way I did.
Do they know the implication? The reality of what's happening here?
Are you really saying that a kid that's 14, if they have sex with an adult. "Molestation" always happened?
One way people word it, which annoys the shit out of me..
"They're not CAPABLE of giving consent"
... I can agree that it's wrong.
And also say this is the dumbest way it could possibly be worded.
Ofc they can give consent
And yet THIS is the way everyone chooses to say it.
It drives me crazy. Because they then think "What, you're DEFENDING THIS?!"
I agree with you on most I think
Oh.
To me the rule is simple
Those stupid pottymouth princess videos.
Above 16. Ideally above 18 if there's a relevant age difference
That's an excellent example of non-criminal child abuse.
Getting those little girls to drop f-bombs repeatedly.
They don't know what they're doing.
They don't know what they're going to look back on in their lives.
don't go too far tho
"Wow they had me do this shit?"
Manipulation like that happens to adults too
"This is so tasteless."
Coz my next question is..
Back to the sex stuff. Anything I say also comes with "I don't think people should do one night stands."
I really don't.
If the age of consent is below 18
I think with sex there should at least be the INTENT to be a couple.
Why is ch1ld porn illegal if they aren't 18?
@Scribblehatch ohhhh
that's too right wing
For todays society
๐
Sex is disposable nowadays
that's what the left created
Well, strangely enough, the opposite is true.
Millennials have been getting the least sex of anyone in 60 years.
85,553 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 317/856
| Next