Yes. It's arbitrary everywhere.

I always heard that as a saying

No one agrees on this shit. And yet every area brings the hammer down like you spat in the face of GAWD

Where do you live if you don't mind me asking?

I need to search for that

I do mind. s:

Kk, np

16 is acceptable imo

I think it depends entirely on the person to go even younger.

Nah.. kids should have their experiences with other kids

But it gets rarer and rarer quite quickly, you not molesting a person in that scenario.

"Molesting"

Prepubescent you're down to a 0% success rate of not-molestation.

I really don't get the use of that word

I fucking explained it. 😨

Amnesiac motherfugga

Age difference cannot equal to automatic "molesting"

Molesting has to be against their will

Or if manipulation was involved

It should not be assumed

That's why I defined it the way I did.

Do they know the implication? The reality of what's happening here?

Are you really saying that a kid that's 14, if they have sex with an adult. "Molestation" always happened?

One way people word it, which annoys the shit out of me..

"They're not CAPABLE of giving consent"

... I can agree that it's wrong.

And also say this is the dumbest way it could possibly be worded.

Ofc they can give consent

And yet THIS is the way everyone chooses to say it.

It drives me crazy. Because they then think "What, you're DEFENDING THIS?!"

I agree with you on most I think

Oh.

To me the rule is simple

Those stupid pottymouth princess videos.

Above 16. Ideally above 18 if there's a relevant age difference

That's an excellent example of non-criminal child abuse.

Getting those little girls to drop f-bombs repeatedly.

They don't know what they're doing.

They don't know what they're going to look back on in their lives.

don't go too far tho

"Wow they had me do this shit?"