And no one is acknowledging it.

"But.. with tinder though.. How is that possible"

Everyone's mind darts to the same place.

Tinder works for barely anyone.

Quantity yes. Number of partners increased exponentially though

so you missed the point

I dunno what you're saying with "quantity yes."

It's a pareto distribution. 20% of the dudes get 80% of the girls on Tinder

Girls don't even know your name before having sex with you

Or something like that

Accurate.

I mean that you mentioned quantity

>Millennials have been getting the least sex of anyone in 60 years.

that's true in quantity

Okay lemme put it this way.

More virgins now than before.

But millennials are having way more partners

Clearer?

Even so, the number of partners is still high on average

Even with the increased number of virgins

That's not--

Okay but focus on the higher number of virgins.

Sure

That's what should be found extremely bizarre.

Everyone assumes the exact opposite until they see the stats.

Not really surprising

I tell it to people all the time

And they do not believe me.

They then show ME stats, that I alert them as to how they're reading it wrong.

When you destroy the motivation for relationships. Why have sex?

😅

That is one reason, yes.

Its not an uncommon way of thinking

But another is that online dating became too 'default'

That too

Going out and meeting people really isn't a thing now.

Women are more demanding

Meaning the top guys get more sex

But the bottom doesnt

Forget the 'plural' of sex

Some people just want companionship and never, ever get it.

For the same reason they don't get sex.

Absolutely *No Way* to get a foot in the door.

No advice for them. No venue. Nothing.

They've been failed before the game started.

I'm not sure I get where you are going. Though I agree with the statements

With a game this rigged, it sure would be a bad time for the job market to be shit, right?

there's no way to get a stable relationship if you never had none before. The odds are low

It's funny how an economic crash will make women more picky, not less.

Unless you meet someone in the same situation

Because that's the exact opposite of how it's SENSIBLE to react.

hmm...

How so?

Which part am I being asked that about?

Economic crash means they can't aim higher. So I would say, less picky

Specially as they get near the 30's mark

The problem they have is. A guy doesn't want a girl in their 30s that had her fun around

Oh they'll reach 30 and then stay hypergamous.

Happens all the time.

They would pick younger

I think we're approaching a broken bridge.

Sure. But no relationships

Hopefully we can erect some sort of ramp.

But the bridge ahead is surely very broken.

imo... you can only shift it back to conservative a bit

Or society will change a lot

😂

So many video Gavin makes.

He says the same shit over and over

"OMG YOU GUYS. HAVE BABIES ALREADY. HAVE THEM"

Shut up Gavin. You stupid tool.

Kids are a trap

Relationships don't work nowadays in the west

Let's ignore that for a second and just acknowledge everything we've said so far.

Most people aren't meeting people.

So regardless of the 'trap'

The bottom

Isnt

There's no opportunity to even fall for it.

Hmm....

there's always some bad picks they can take

If they are willing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1uhWpYaPMo

It's really telling

"STOP SOWING YOUR WILD OATS"

I'm on mobile. can't multitask

Do we agree though?

there's always bad picks. If they are willing

Even for the bottom

But most refuse or don't care

@Scribblehatch

... Eh?

>There's no opportunity to even fall for it.

I said that the bottom guys always have some bad picks to take

Oh.

Yes.

But most refuse or don't care

And conservative talking heads almost never understand this

"I think if most guys married the first woman they saw on the street they'd be much better off!"

But its not likebthey are doomed.