That would be molestation.

I find the use of that word very... baity

Buh?

Taking physical advantage of someone.

That's what I call molesting.

One party doesn't know the implications or gravity of what they're doing. They're being taken advantage of. Ergo, molestation.

But then it is assumed that because of their age it is "always" "molesting". Which is also wrong

What if they know?

I think there are laws and good ideas.

It's a GOOD IDEA to halve your age, and then add 7, to know the minimum amount of years you should go.

And freeze at 18

... Well.

=p

That's where it gets completely stupid.

That's the law in my state.

But EVERY STATE ADJACENT TO ME

It's 16.

Wait.. thats actually the law?

Not even one year of difference. TWO YEARS.

Yes. It's arbitrary everywhere.

I always heard that as a saying

No one agrees on this shit. And yet every area brings the hammer down like you spat in the face of GAWD

Where do you live if you don't mind me asking?

I need to search for that

I do mind. s:

Kk, np

16 is acceptable imo

I think it depends entirely on the person to go even younger.

Nah.. kids should have their experiences with other kids

But it gets rarer and rarer quite quickly, you not molesting a person in that scenario.

"Molesting"

Prepubescent you're down to a 0% success rate of not-molestation.

I really don't get the use of that word

I fucking explained it. 😨

Amnesiac motherfugga

Age difference cannot equal to automatic "molesting"

Molesting has to be against their will

Or if manipulation was involved

It should not be assumed

That's why I defined it the way I did.

Do they know the implication? The reality of what's happening here?