Cool we agree.

I miss read what yo said earlier.

i dont think dyslexia is your only mental issue if your only way to define something you care so much about is to repeate over an over the same nondefintion as "races are just a term for the races of human populations"

how could you misread "define what a race is"?

nigga ive defined what a race is more than you have today

No I miss read synonym for symptom.

oh

well then give me a definition without synonyms

I made a mistake.

its fine, im patient

I think race is just the subspeciation of human populations.

do you know what that means? if you do then say it becuase what THAT means is the actual definition of race not "just the subspeciation of human populations"

Yes it just means that different populations were separated for a long time and evolved in different environments.

what emperical values is evolution messured by for human populations in different environments?

doesent seem practical

they should learn about the bottle gourd

Human populations migrated from Africa and lived in sperate environments for thousands of years and they evolued be able to live in different environments (Europe is different to Africa for example).

aussie thats not an answer to my question

What exactly are you looking for?

the answer to my question, i was very exact with it

Holy fuck. Go get a PM, you two. THis is shitposting.

how is evolution of humans within the last 100k years messured?

you must be new here zeta

The differences are enough to show the evoulation.

what are the differences?

In IQ, bone structure, brain size, ect.

you mean averages correct? and you messuring phenotypical and psychological traits there. are those the only traits?

There are physical differences to.

phenotype is a scientific term for physical traits

My bad.

@Arch-Fiend I sure am. New enough to know that y'all are dumb.

we do this shit all the time

I noticed.

anyway aussie if phenotypical differences define race, and psychological differences define race, on averages within populations then couldent i just take any population on earth, then messure its phenotypical differences against those of any other group and extrapolate race from them? and if not why?

I know there are phenotypical differences but phenotype isn't race it tends to be more ethnic than racial.

ethnicity is defined as the following An ethnic group, or an ethnicity, is a category of people who identify with each other based on similarities such as common ancestry, language, history, society, culture or nation.[1][2] Ethnicity is usually an inherited status based on the society in which one lives. Membership of an ethnic group tends to be defined by a shared cultural heritage, ancestry, origin myth, history, homeland, language or dialect, symbolic systems such as religion, mythology and ritual, cuisine, dressing style, art, and physical appearance.

sounds a shit ton like race dont it?

you realize that bone shape and brain size are phenotypical and thats how you were defining race earlier right?

I mean biologicaly speaking. For example the differant European phenotypes are mostly on ethnic lines.

no they arnt, ethnicity isint scientific

its not biologic

I gess we will have to disagree.

nigga this is how things are actually defined

if you dont like it maybe YOUR not a race realist

facts dont care about your feelings

I am a race realist which is why I think ethnicity is different to race.

what would you call a race realist thats only that because its "cool". like trans-trender

ethnicity isint a scientific definition

its a social construct

Ok then phenotypes are not races if you profer.

ethnicity is as scientific as patrearchy

nigga phenotypes ARE races

thats what im trying to tell you

ethnicity is just how people define themselves

its like religion

Humans are a patriarchal species.

*faceplam*

Can you give me some evidence to prove what you are saying.

this is reminding me of when i was in an ancap server

think once in a while aussie, sometimes its better than feeling like you know everything

ill leave you with that

So you claim ethnicity isn't biological and race is based on phenotypes not speciation and don't provide any evidce to back up those claims so why shouuld I believe what yo are saying?

I don't claim to know everything your making a claim, why won't you prove it if you are right?

"the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition."

no where in there does it say biological. you are making the extraordinary claim here.

speciation is an observation of phenotypical and behavural traits that eventually lead to 2 creatures no longer genetically able to breed with eachother

often they are unable to breed with eachother long long before they are geneticly unable to

I want a paper or something that proves what you are saying.

Come on give me something.

well aussie the only way we know the different species of the dinosaurs are looking at their physical differences

that and when they show up in different layers of rock

Not about the differences in species I want proof for what you are saying about race and ethnicity.

but even then we KNOW they are different species when they are physicaly different to an extent weve hypothosized they are likely no longer breeding

Here is something yo could take a look at to prove what I'm saying. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqLLYlJt0io&t=2s

"Race refers to a person's physical characteristics, such as bone structure and skin, hair, or eye color. Ethnicity, however, refers to cultural factors, including nationality, regional culture, ancestry, and language."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_group#Terminology

Thank you.

personally i would also cover things that fall under ethnicity into race because cultural factors which are predicated on psychological and behavural tendences effect isolational tendences in large groups of people

if race is to be used as subspecies or beed

breed*

the fact it is not biological is simple. Two Germans can move to America. They can have a kid in America, their child would not be a different race, however his ethnicity could easily be American depending on how his parents raised him should he later move to Germany.

the american race will eventually evolve

it will most likely be tan, and send race realist into a tizzy.

it will, not because of race mixing though

more likely redish skinned

sunburn is not a race

red skin isint sunburn

although if it was, it would highly prone to melanoma

To bad race mixing will just make you guys mutts. https://mic.com/articles/87359/national-geographic-determined-what-americans-will-look-like-in-2050-and-it-s-beautiful#.nDYsCTfyT

thooough technology may also shape the american race evolution

mutts usually live longer and are less prone to disease.

most european races are mutts

in fact, they are usually healthier all around.

around the edges atleast

something about inbreeding not being good and thats the only way to keep something "pure