shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 224/856
| Next
wholesome mpreg is not for fapping you sick fuck
*your true colors are showing*
but depictions of war is simple fap material to autocrats
I don't know and I don't want to know what you degenerates get upto with that crap what I don't want to you to do is call it art because it's not. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHw4MMEnmpc&t=1s
as are holy depictions
because you've told me not to do something you do realize that I'm just going to do it more, right?
you're taking me too seriously aussie
Depictions or war show a country's history which I think is more valuable then degeneracy.
@Deleted User are you saying you don't shitpost?
Aussie is a filthy normie
old news
depictions only of the approved versions of events
@ZetaBlues I don't shitpost in other languages.
recorded first hand accounts are much better than propaganda
I don't care if it's of historical events or of fiction but degenerate crap isn't art.
but propaganda is degenerate crap
I know Jewish propaganda is degenerate crap, what's your point?
@Grenade123 For the record propaganda is the promotion of a course which means propaganda is only bad when people who are promoting bad things are creating it.
bad is subjective
bad is simply the opposite of the side you like
For example if someone created propoganda which promotes the nuclear family that would be good propaganda but if someone created anti nuclear family propaganda that wold be bad propaganda.
Yes I think propaganda which promots communism, anti family, feminism, degeneracy and white genocide is bad propoganda.
@Grenade123 I'm sure you also think the promotion of anti western propaganda is a bad thing so what is your point? You and I feel the same about propaganda which promotes things which we see as bad.
our definitions of "anti-western" propaganda differ wildly
and genocide is bad, period.
The point is the same we both don't like it so what's your point?
we both don't like propaganda.
It depends what the propaganda is promoting.
the spreading of lies, half truths, highly bias conclusions that do not have data to support their causation.
This for example promots the building of the wall on America's southern border which would be good for America thus it is good propaganda.
As I said earlier not all propaganda is based on lies and half truths. Propaganda is just the promotion of an idea, policy, ect.
"information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view."
biased or misleading in nature
I think that you think that people who think like me have to use bad tactics like lies and half truths means we have but don't because we are on the side of truth.
building a wall is based off of speculation, with no evidence showing anything much greater than a fence, which already exists along significant portions of the us boarder.
you use correlation to equal causation.
your typical line of thinking is what made people believe TVs themselves made people fat
You will be biased to towards pro liberalism propaganda. Propaganda isn't a bad thing it just depends on what is being promoted and how.
also is lazy, stopping at answers that feel easy, rather than keep digging to the root cause.
I was using the build the wall poster as evidce that there can be good propaganda.
you share much with the judge who wants to ban kitchen knives and liberals that want to ban guns.
Do you think most people keep digging let alone even care about politics most people don't.
and so i should listen to the people who stopped digging and just made up answers because it was easy?
People need to be lead by good people insted of bad people.
to some you are good, to others Bernie is good. who gets to decide who these "good people" are?
Most people just care about their jobs, friends and family they don't care about foreign policy, economics, military, ect.
The thing is most people aren't free thinkers they are followers which is how a functioning society just works.
must people are not raised to be free thinkers
that would be dangerous wouldn't it?
You can't have everyone be a artist, poet, ect. It's just the way people are. It doesn't matter if you rase people to be free thinkers becasue most people won't be even if you raise people that way.
Most people just do what everyone else dose and what the leaders of a society say is good.
and how do you determine who are really "free thinkers"
poets and artists are hardly free thinkers.
If you have good people ruling a society most people will be good that's just the way people are.
take some drugs and anyone can write
what is "good"
People who think for themsleves are free thinkers.
good for me can come at the expense of you
so what is good
What creates a working and moral society is good.
that doesn't mean it is good for me
or even my family
Do you want to live in a society which works and is prosperous?
yes, but what you define as "working" can leave me and my family behind.
invading and taking local resources rather than setting down roots and figuring things out was a "working" and sometimes "prosperous" society.... except for those invaded
I think societies should be homogeneous so I don't want to have foreigners in my country and I don't want to expand and invad other countires so what's your point?
that would be require kicking me and my girlfriend out of my current country. Anyone who is "mixed" would no be without a society. THAT is my point
Survival is the most moral thing that any group can do so if they need to take other peoples resources so that they can surive is moral.
its also the lazy route.
i could stop doing work
then just kill everyone around me for "survival"
I think mixed race people should be sterilized.
everyone is mixed race unless you can define how far back you need to go
I mean groups not individuals.
Don't give me that crap mate. You know there are races.
how many are there? where do you determine exactly where they came from? and much "tainted blood" do you need to be considered mixed?
and groups are made of individuals
im mixed, scottish german
you cannot have a forest without trees
Yes there are some edge cases bt that dosen't disprove the concept.
edge cases that are not handled means a flawed design
sometimes it means you need to add, othertimes it is evident of a major flaw
If you can disprove race go right ahead.
if you can define race, go right ahead
you are the one making the claim there is more races than human. Prove to me that an Irish Wheaton Terror and an American Wheaton Terror are not the same species despite different coats and related allele. So me the genetic markets, and how much of them you need to be a specific race. Show me how humans born in russia (which covers a large part of asian), Germany, Nordic countries, and the EU are all the same race despite being wildly different.
The subspeciation of humans. A race is a grouping of humans based on shared physical or social qualities into categories generally viewed as distinct by society.
i think the irish weaton terror is probably a different race of wheaton terror than the american
"social qualities"
good, so the Americans are a race.
and the wheaton terror is probably a different race of terror than the russles terror
and the terror is probably a different race of dog than a labridor
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/85/5b/50/855b504e5e3c95c791aeb903b55f3d83.jpg
Irish on the left, American on the right.
just like ashkanazi jews are a different race of european than germans, and europeans are a different race of humans than africans
my parents had one of each, they were the best of doggos. the American one pasted away a few years ago, the Irish one is still hanging around
Ethnicities aren't races.
yes they are
then what is a "social quality", because that is not genetics.
the scots are geneticly and phenotypically different than the romanians
The point I made with different breeds of dogs is that it's the same with Human races.
85,553 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 224/856
| Next