newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 103/874
| Next
And for him to procrastinate on his vidyas
and talking about shoving bike pump up their asses
And trying to put gay pr0n on the stream
oh shit; speaking of which, warskilive is live
SHUT IT DOWN https://streamable.com/hmcgj
oi vey
warski gets arrested for threats against hasbro
First, you gotta get mad!\
"WHO external Situation report 14 - 04 December 2017"
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/259556/1/Ex-PlagueMadagascar04122017.pdf
๐ฎ
So I heard the memo or something was getting released
Whens that again?
Already got
Cause Im kinda waiting on the autists on 4Chan to make sense of it.
Fuck yes
Got a link to one?
Nope, sorry man
On my phone, so that shit is too hard to do
Nah man, ill dm it to you
Its supposedly the one from the official govt site
I already read it man
Ah fair
Anything you saw
FBI used a known-to-be-fake dossier fabricated by someone on the DNC's payroll to acquire a FISA surveillance warrant on Trump and co.
THat I just saw there.
WHich one btw, the pissgate one?
The exact one.
Lol, that one shouldnt have flown
Trumps a damn Mysophobe
You think someone like him is going to let some russian hooker piss on a mattress?
It didn't fly
DIdnt stop the media from parading it anyway.
The feds KNEW it was fake, still used it, and STILL GOT THE WARRANT.
eww they fucking used yahoo news as a source
And best of all
So now the heat should be on the feds and the ones giving out the warrant?
The guy that was building the dossier
Hmm it did mention Yahoo in the memo
Steele?
Was the guy leaking it in the first place
SO a situation of the X investigated X and found no wrongdoing?
Nah something else
A situation of Y citing X citing Y,.
Citogenesis?
It's a clear and cut example of how 'anonymous sources' should never be used, ever.
I think thats a word
Yeah, it is
Thing is people argue that leaked docs to wikileaks and whistleblowers are "anonymous sources"
The people doing the leaking I mean
Its more of a matter of how much you trust the publication.
I kinda trust Wikileaks to rely on anonymous whistleblowers, but dont trust CNN for their anonymous sources
Wikileaks doesn't do anonymous sources either, you do have to verify your identity with WL.
Wikileaks has also built up a reputation of not publishing lies
That too
If you canโt prove to them what you have is fact, they wonโt publish it
Sure Wikileaks may not publish everything, sure they may be biased and target specific groups with leaks, but you can be certain that anything they do choose to publish is true
There may be more to the story than whatโs published through them, but what is published is true.
Itโs up to the reader to determine if whatโs left out is left out because of Wikileaksโ biases or because Wikileaks didnโt want to make a claim it wasnโt 100% sure of
๐
So its more of our trust of the publisher, not the presence of an anonymous source.
My point is, that we all trust WL to verify them, files and the person doing the leak.
And we all trust cops to cover their own ass at the expense of the people
Honestly trust is the big issue. The mainstream establishment has pissed all over the peopleโs trust, because theyโre so use to the people trusting them blindly because whoโs going to prove them wrong.
Well, sometimes you need to rock the boat a little to remind them that it can still sink
People get lazy in peace time. Same applies to people getting lazy with their sources.
But with the advent of television & the internet itโs become very easy to prove them wrong. If a corrupt Deputy Marshal showed up to your home and shot your son back in 1850 whoโd ever believe you? Itโs your word against a badge, and people had trust in the authorities. Today all you have to do is point a camera at the corrupt Marshal and bam, instant evidence that can be uploaded to the eyes of millions in a matter of seconds
And well, we have the issue with the lie getting published first
Like just publish the lie, and then the correction which will get alot less vieww
For the first time in History the people can legitimately hold the establishment accountable for their lies
Because the crazy inaccuracies and lies from the mainstream media have always existed, theyโve just been impossible to prove.
Not arguing here though. Its just that the people are not using that ability
And the media is taking advantage of that
Sure more people are waking up
Because that farmer whoโs been misrepresented & Libeled in a big city paper. Who the fuck is going to have heard his side of things. He had no way of speaking out to as large an audience
Actualy, I mean, people are waking up. So thats good.
And well... We might be seeing a shift here
Shift away from MSM to more independant news outlets
But today that guy can get on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and speak out
And if enough people care his voice will be heard by more than the 20 people he knows personally
He could reach an audience of millions
Thing is, that is the potential, what Id like to see more, is the awareness of that potential.
ANd well... Even then, the person cant rely on the internet alone. FB and Twitter do censor shit.
Who knows how many people got censored like Lindsay Shepherd did 90 years ago, but today, all it takes is a social media post getting into the correct hands and all of a sudden boom
Ah that is true, we still had to depend on well... Commentators commenting on them
But well, future seems brighter than it was a few months ago
According to Chairman Nunes that memo was just part 1
Another one on the State Department is in the works
Oh fuck, electric boogaloo?
Like #MeToo has blown up so much that some extreme feminists are finally giving a voice to Bill Clintonโs accusers. Even CNN employees were retweeting an article that his accusers werenโt just right wing nutjobs.
You mean people doubted them in the beginning?
Oh fuck you meant Clinton
For some reason I saw Cosby
Well, to be honest, most of the accusers are now already quite successful in their own right, they will stand to loose alot if they were proven to be liars.
Social media has given the people an incredible amount of power. 2016 was the first year where a majority of the kids who grew up with social media were eligible to vote and look what happened. The most popular Republican candidate was a complete outsider and the Democrats had to cheat to prevent Bernie, an independent, from winning their primary.
To be honest, Trump was an outside to the party, but not to the people.
I mean, people knew him, he had alot of brand recognition.
87,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 103/874
| Next