ya thats more my point. be cautious but not worth going too far with it unless something looks weird when you log in

i forget if FB is one of the sites that will tell you where the false logins came from

tim finds out his cat was stepping on his phone and mashing buttons haha

He has one?

https://www.instagram.com/p/BnwjBsVnSN1/?taken-by=donaldjtrumpjr

Not the first time

They did that before

oh shit that love letter nails it

he wwas a mysiginist at 5

he cant have possibly gottten better over time and understanding

Misogists

ya i have a hard time clicking edit on this tiny screen

I cant wait till she lands in prison for falsely accusing a supreme court nominee of sexual assault

not sure that will be the case, but we will see

I am praying to an imaginary sky wizard

they'll never be able to put her in prison for anything because there's no evidence either way

thats sort of my thought, its not illegal to accuse someone of something

well, it's not illegal to accuse someone of something if you have no 'actual malice', i.e., that you legitimately believed the information to be true.

and there's no way to prove that this woman doesn't believe her own claim. she might.

i mean, it soulnds like a plausable thing to have happened.

30 years is a bit long to wait to come out for it

but i wont say it couldnt have happened

we have another person whom the woman is claiming was in the room at the time who is denying involvement in any such incident. we have a discrepancy between the therapist note in 2012 and the story presented now.

ya, sounds like a shoveled load of BS, but we will see how it plays out

Vox put out an article before the woman was identified:
https://www.vox.com/2018/9/14/17860488/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-georgetown-prep-defense

And MSNBC's creatures seemed pretty skeptical as well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eJeWvpUut8

Though this was before the woman's identity was known. This early doubt could merely be an act to lend credibility to her story now that her name is known. "Well I was skeptical before but..."

Or it could be legitimate skepticism at what is honestly a complete Hail Mary from the democrats.

to me, it seems like the answer is pull his name, and put a new name on the list to confirm

one not mired in controversy

I think most people can see through this nonsense. Only the hardcore pussyhat crew are going to not have doubts about the story and timing.

No.

but hard to say if anyone would be found without something to burn them for

The answer is to ignore the bullshit and just confirm the guy.

except he will always be viewed as the one that got away

Because a new name would require new hearings, which would push the whole confirmation process until after the election.

and will always have it loo over him

everystory will start out like this

Kavanah who had controversy while being confirmed

every story

The Republicans can't keep falling for this shit. They can't keep caving to this obvious slander.

Ignore it, confirm the guy, and tell the democrats and their operatives to go fuck themselves.

need to find someone squeeky clean for this one if you ask me.... if this isnt that guy, find another guy

Kavanaugh ***IS*** squeaky clean.

But he's a man, so they can just fabricate a sexual harassment allegation that cannot be proven or disproven and people fall for it.

i dont disagree with what you are saying

but im telling you keeping the guy will be more trouble than he is worth in the long run

every story will start out pointing out this part of history, everything he votes on, everything he says

Personally I would've preferred Diane Sykes but there is no avoiding this shit.

the dems are so afflicted with TDS that any pick will be labeled as some kind of great satan

No one right of mao will be "clean" lol

This is partisan politics. You gotta just let it go

Any republican candidate, ***anyone at all***, with a Y-chromosome is going to be hit with sexual allegations.

i think they shuold have put a dem name on the list just to watch them eat one of their own beause it was a trump pick'

THEN anyone woulc be able to be slotted in'

because they ate their own

Greetings from south africa guys

do everyitng look correct

looks correct

They can just fabricate the allegations out of thin air. Find some dyed-in-the-wool supporter willing to lie for the cause.

They did do it correct

There's no need to do some 4D chess shit

Trump can't put democrats up for nomination without breaking a key campaign promise.

Hai SA man

He promised that all supreme court picks would come from a pre-published list.

i didnt know that

hadnt heard that one

So the democrats have had two years or more to fabricate dirt and formulate strategies on all of them.

yep, i was just typing that

just like with the Russia investigation 😉

they're not smart enough for strategies, only fictional dirt that the faithful will believe

***It literally does not matter who he picks from that list*** they already have a battle plan of lies, stunts, smears, attacks, rumors, allegations, etc.

thats why i say pick a dem, watch the Tump delision destroy a dem pick

then no one will question anything anymore

You have to accept that everything is partisan warfare from here on out. No compromise, no gentleman's understanding, no rule-of-law, nothing.

all their arguements get destroyed or sidestepped

i do acept that, no reason cant out maneuver them right off the bat

I can see it happen that if Trump would pick a Dem,

The media would be like "HaHAAA look! we are winning, he folded"

blue wave success

but the senate wouldnt approve it'

But picking a dem would a) break a campaign promise b) piss off his own supporters, and c) give a victory to the democrats.

what Atkins said

so it would make trump look like he tried'

It would be retarded

doesn't matter if it passes

nah. i think thats too extreeme adkins

Trump doesn't have to look like anything except victorious.

it would only make him a traitor in the eyes of Reps

And the Dems won't give him anything for that

so wait

yall would turn on trump over one thing?

No compromise. Just warfare.

one thing

If he plays ball with the Dems, they still won't give anything back

would you?

no

I'm not American, i don't have a stake in this,

I personally would still be with him, but i'd consider it a bad mark

"playing ball with the dems" is just a nice way of saying 'being a cuck'

But it will damage the resolve the Reps have atm

fuck playing ball

thats bullshit and you know it