ya thats more my point. be cautious but not worth going too far with it unless something looks weird when you log in

i forget if FB is one of the sites that will tell you where the false logins came from

tim finds out his cat was stepping on his phone and mashing buttons haha

He has one?

https://www.instagram.com/p/BnwjBsVnSN1/?taken-by=donaldjtrumpjr

Not the first time

They did that before

oh shit that love letter nails it

he wwas a mysiginist at 5

he cant have possibly gottten better over time and understanding

Misogists

ya i have a hard time clicking edit on this tiny screen

I cant wait till she lands in prison for falsely accusing a supreme court nominee of sexual assault

not sure that will be the case, but we will see

I am praying to an imaginary sky wizard

they'll never be able to put her in prison for anything because there's no evidence either way

thats sort of my thought, its not illegal to accuse someone of something

well, it's not illegal to accuse someone of something if you have no 'actual malice', i.e., that you legitimately believed the information to be true.

and there's no way to prove that this woman doesn't believe her own claim. she might.

i mean, it soulnds like a plausable thing to have happened.

30 years is a bit long to wait to come out for it

but i wont say it couldnt have happened

we have another person whom the woman is claiming was in the room at the time who is denying involvement in any such incident. we have a discrepancy between the therapist note in 2012 and the story presented now.

ya, sounds like a shoveled load of BS, but we will see how it plays out

Vox put out an article before the woman was identified:
https://www.vox.com/2018/9/14/17860488/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-georgetown-prep-defense

And MSNBC's creatures seemed pretty skeptical as well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eJeWvpUut8

Though this was before the woman's identity was known. This early doubt could merely be an act to lend credibility to her story now that her name is known. "Well I was skeptical before but..."

Or it could be legitimate skepticism at what is honestly a complete Hail Mary from the democrats.

to me, it seems like the answer is pull his name, and put a new name on the list to confirm

one not mired in controversy

I think most people can see through this nonsense. Only the hardcore pussyhat crew are going to not have doubts about the story and timing.

No.

but hard to say if anyone would be found without something to burn them for

The answer is to ignore the bullshit and just confirm the guy.

except he will always be viewed as the one that got away

Because a new name would require new hearings, which would push the whole confirmation process until after the election.

and will always have it loo over him

everystory will start out like this

Kavanah who had controversy while being confirmed

every story

The Republicans can't keep falling for this shit. They can't keep caving to this obvious slander.