Message from @Atkins

Discord ID: 491268855394598915


2018-09-17 15:21:30 UTC  
2018-09-17 15:22:11 UTC  

And MSNBC's creatures seemed pretty skeptical as well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eJeWvpUut8

2018-09-17 15:22:59 UTC  

Though this was before the woman's identity was known. This early doubt could merely be an act to lend credibility to her story now that her name is known. "Well I was skeptical before but..."

2018-09-17 15:23:32 UTC  

Or it could be legitimate skepticism at what is honestly a complete Hail Mary from the democrats.

2018-09-17 15:23:46 UTC  

to me, it seems like the answer is pull his name, and put a new name on the list to confirm

2018-09-17 15:24:03 UTC  

one not mired in controversy

2018-09-17 15:24:05 UTC  

I think most people can see through this nonsense. Only the hardcore pussyhat crew are going to not have doubts about the story and timing.

2018-09-17 15:24:13 UTC  

No.

2018-09-17 15:24:16 UTC  

but hard to say if anyone would be found without something to burn them for

2018-09-17 15:24:23 UTC  

The answer is to ignore the bullshit and just confirm the guy.

2018-09-17 15:24:38 UTC  

except he will always be viewed as the one that got away

2018-09-17 15:24:43 UTC  

Because a new name would require new hearings, which would push the whole confirmation process until after the election.

2018-09-17 15:24:44 UTC  

and will always have it loo over him

2018-09-17 15:24:52 UTC  

everystory will start out like this

2018-09-17 15:25:04 UTC  

Kavanah who had controversy while being confirmed

2018-09-17 15:25:14 UTC  

every story

2018-09-17 15:25:39 UTC  

The Republicans can't keep falling for this shit. They can't keep caving to this obvious slander.

2018-09-17 15:26:04 UTC  

Ignore it, confirm the guy, and tell the democrats and their operatives to go fuck themselves.

2018-09-17 15:26:05 UTC  

need to find someone squeeky clean for this one if you ask me.... if this isnt that guy, find another guy

2018-09-17 15:26:27 UTC  

Kavanaugh ***IS*** squeaky clean.

2018-09-17 15:27:02 UTC  

But he's a man, so they can just fabricate a sexual harassment allegation that cannot be proven or disproven and people fall for it.

2018-09-17 15:27:39 UTC  

i dont disagree with what you are saying

2018-09-17 15:27:51 UTC  

but im telling you keeping the guy will be more trouble than he is worth in the long run

2018-09-17 15:28:24 UTC  

every story will start out pointing out this part of history, everything he votes on, everything he says

2018-09-17 15:28:29 UTC  

Personally I would've preferred Diane Sykes but there is no avoiding this shit.

2018-09-17 15:28:30 UTC  

the dems are so afflicted with TDS that any pick will be labeled as some kind of great satan

2018-09-17 15:28:43 UTC  

No one right of mao will be "clean" lol

2018-09-17 15:28:58 UTC  

This is partisan politics. You gotta just let it go

2018-09-17 15:29:09 UTC  

Any republican candidate, ***anyone at all***, with a Y-chromosome is going to be hit with sexual allegations.

2018-09-17 15:29:15 UTC  

i think they shuold have put a dem name on the list just to watch them eat one of their own beause it was a trump pick'

2018-09-17 15:29:30 UTC  

THEN anyone woulc be able to be slotted in'

2018-09-17 15:29:35 UTC  

because they ate their own

2018-09-17 15:29:39 UTC  

Greetings from south africa guys

2018-09-17 15:29:41 UTC  

do everyitng look correct

2018-09-17 15:29:47 UTC  

looks correct

2018-09-17 15:29:48 UTC  

They can just fabricate the allegations out of thin air. Find some dyed-in-the-wool supporter willing to lie for the cause.

2018-09-17 15:29:53 UTC  

They did do it correct

2018-09-17 15:30:05 UTC  

There's no need to do some 4D chess shit

2018-09-17 15:30:17 UTC  

Trump can't put democrats up for nomination without breaking a key campaign promise.

2018-09-17 15:30:20 UTC  

Hai SA man

2018-09-17 15:30:30 UTC  

He promised that all supreme court picks would come from a pre-published list.