Nah

sexbots will only eliminate the desperate and the degenerate from the gene pool

Ues

Sex bots will be total sluts. They'll get slut-shamed.

No more Incels

No more MGTOW

unless we also similtaneously start growning humans in test tubes

LGBTQMGTOW

Basically zero rape

people will stop dating/marrying/having children

@Aktriaz we can do that already

unless we make them SUPER good to the point where they're both genuinely superior to actual sex and can emulate real human emotion almost perfectly

Yes

Or

Or

Neuralink

Where you attach your brain

To a computer

Get put into a simulation

And it's exactly like real life

at which point we'll figure out how to reproduce using exclusively our robot waifus, and then we'll gas the women

lol

WOMEN ARE OBSOLETE

just get my android catboy trap mpreg

I had a thing for robot waifus back then

MGE had a few I recall

my gf is super into robot waifus

Ew

Dude you into koreans

THey are pretty much robots

accurate

Racist

heheheheheheh

Hey hey

If we have sexbots

We can have catgirls

relevant futurama:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrrADTN-dvg

why would you want a bigger cat with human intelligence

For ppl who dont mind wall of text

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/jul/26/the-free-speech-panic-censorship-how-the-right-concocted-a-crisis

that just seems like a terrible idea

I found a video where a guy said that 80% of men would be MGTOW in 5 years

catgirls are a fucking mistake

There is plenty wrong with authors argument

The right concocted it? Nah

Just read it

To me it seems like the author didnt realy know what he wanted to say

I only rarely agree with Guardian opinion pieces. They deliberately seek out extreme opinion for clickbait.

Aside from the old you have internet so non platforming isnt realy censorship argument

Some opinion pieces there are not so bad

Early disagreement with it. It's not just a right wing thing. I'm a centre left social democrat and fully believe there's an anti-Enlightenment insurgency coming out of critical theory in academia.

😔

I would agree but its teritorial issue

We dont have this problem in czech for example

I remember watching triumph des willens in student film club as an example of well done propaganda for example

They cite a number of studies which are just wrong.

Here's Sean Steven's takedown of the argument that it's all overblown. Do read it, it's a 3-parter intended for academic audiences.

https://heterodoxacademy.org/skeptics-are-wrong-about-campus-speech/

You could hardly do that in the uk

And Sean Steven has lots of numbers to back it up and addresses most of the common arguments point-by-point.

I wonder how many traditional media companies are desperate for cash that they resort to clickbait

Seems like alot

Almost all at this point.

Well clickbait is wide spread from right to left

Tbh in the uk daily express is the biggest click baiter lol

Titles like" jacob rees mog refuted this remoaner argument with this excelent point"

And so on lol

Skim read it and I disagreed with the whole thing bar the criticisms of US right wingers. Eg. Nonsense like the coupling of free speech and free markets which in reality are entirely unrelated concepts.

His thesis is that there is no problem with academia and rather what's happening is that conservatives are panicking about a reduction in their voter numbers so inventing a moral panic. Well he must've been living under a rock the last decade because we've had a conservative government since 2010 and a Brexit movement largely spearheaded by right wing sentiment. Conservatives are not panicking about their voter numbers.

Yep

It was rather wrong

Thats why i showed it to you lot

I think we are at the stage where some ppl on the left are starting to react to this

But they are very late

They've been reacting.

It was really obviously dishonest. He knows he's trying to invert reality. The true moral panic is coming from the very postcolonialists and feminists he was defending in that piece.

Yep

This is the 5th or 6th opinion piece I've seen arguing it's not a problem.

Far more if you use academic rags.

Academia has convinced itself there isn't a problem. They are selecting for "quality"

And anyone who argues against is no different than a "flat-earther"

Well i hear social sciences are extra bad right now

I'd say the first reaction was late 2016.

They are.

It was the humanities in the 90s and then they literally purged anyone who disagreed.

Now it's the social sciences which are undgergoing the purge.

And they're setting up for the hard sciences as we speak.

Look into heterodox academy and Jonathan Haidt, he got caught up in 2015 and brought it to widespread attention.

*All* these articles will attack him.

Well there is that nonsene about sex differences which some academics want to erase

Apart from that i read some hit pieces claiming that top research is extremely sexist

And female scientists are harased

The "science wars" is a thing. A really good Youtube channel detailing the arguments is King Crocoduck.

Remember the head mod that deleted the KotakuInAction subreddit?

Yeah hes not a mod anymore.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_wars

Basically postmodern critical theorists demanding that western science be ripped up because it's sexist and racist.

The good news is that this nonsense is worst in the Anglophone world. Somewhere like France is far better at ignoring its critical theorists and postmodernism is unpopular there (ironic, given French intellectuals played a huge role in its creation).

Yeah i think you are right

Its spreading tho

@Sarah Jessica Farter Is it like those Africans who wanted to "dismantle western science and restart it from an African perspective"

THose peeople piss me off

What does an "african perspective" add?