Reminiscent of Pulp Fiction?

that dude didnt watch pulp fiction

not the black belt one. The machete yandere girl

I think thats a fair point I have made actually

very fair

I understand that there is double standard on rape but I hear a lot more males who might talk about rape casually and knew one who sexually assaulted someone I know.

Then what about women's rape fantasies?

You cant rape the willing

So while I think female rapists do exist

I think they are less likely

Probably some gene

But seriously
How can it be forced intercourse if a man's flag is raised
if it was unwanted he would be flaccid??

I do wonder if it is just one

Or multiple though

XD

Women can get sex more easily. which contributes in my opinion.

>if you're attracted you consent
>what's a viagra

I get what you mean

But then child send would be legal

By that logic

?? So she has to force feed the man a viagra first?

>nobody slips drugs into people's drinks ever

If a 90 yr old man had intercourse with a 12 yr old boi it is plausible for him to get an erection

So if a woman is aroused not rape?

can you slip viagra into a drink?

Yes

Are you sure about that

So I don’t think that should be a reason

There's like a million prank vids

whats the chemical composition of viagra

Of idiots giving their friends bonerdrank

Also in the one example the woman was force feeding viagra to the guy.

So what I'm seeing here is for it to be classified rape
1. The woman must be armed
2. The woman must first slip a viagra into his drink??

how many times has this happened

im betting close to 0

Wot

Gtg *sleep* if u catch my drift

No, to be classified as rape
>man doesn't consent to sex
>sex is had

Chas

*cyas

Arousal is not consent

How do I get 🅱erified?

Arousal is not consent <:TimThink:482277772497125378>

Why?

You can have a conflict of interests

many women who have been raped admitted to being aroused. still rape

>get turned on by someone
>decide you don't want to do it and say so
>they have sex with you anyway
Why would this be okay?

You can arouse men against their will, even without viagra.

Im not sure any of this is on the same level as forced penetration of a woman

Statutory rape is another case.

I wonder how many men have been legitimately raped by women?

not just #metoo i was having sex but then I didnt want to

I don't know.

And we won't know until the reporting is objective and the same for men as it is for women.

If the genders were reversed, there would be an outcry if a woman had to pay child support to her rapist.

I feel like a good 90% of men would have no problem being forced to have sex with a woman

We do not have double standards, and we minimize the effect and impact on men.

We usually use humor to deflect.

yes if the genders were reversed there would be an outcry
because men and women are different

you cant apply standards equally

Well, if I would use the feminist definition, I think I was raped 6? times.

I don't think its a very good idea for men to use female criteria on themselves

Pressured into sex when not completely in the mood, under the influence of alcohol, a power differential in positions.

Touched while I was asleep, let's see what else?

Hmm ... I was probably raped a dozen times or so.

And don't forget explicit, enthusiastic consent, a la yes means yes.

I should make a Go Fund Me. Pls donate

Also, Brett Kavanaugh raped me 999999999 times in 1459. I can't remember where or when exactly and there were no witnesses.

I don't think its a good idea to have a separate set of criteria

ARE YOU CALING ME A LIAR?

I think it is

if men and women were identical psychologically and biologically then okay but they aren't

That was in re: to "female criteria", sorry to undermine the meme

Why do you hate women?

>not consenting to sex is different because you're an outtie

Who hurt you?

too many neet arrows

eternal summer has rendered people ignorant

But that's also #notanargument m8

maybe @Deleted User is advocating that women do not deserve legal equality?

You're going to have to explain how we get from "sexual dimorphism" to "um actually you did want that sex"

Cuz that's where the disconnect is for me

Why should the law have the power to grant equality?

I AM THE LAW

The law is there to provide a framework for just response to actions that violate the rights of the citizenry

Of which sexual assault can be counted

Why should that apply unequally to some citizens?

So the government decides what counts as equal?

not to grant equality. that it should be equally applied.

Agreed.

Equality before the law would be great.

There is currently a gender sentencing gap of 60%, in terms of prison time and chances of conviction.

Tillyer, Rob, Richard D. Hartley, and Jeffrey T. Ward. "Differential treatment of female defendants: Does criminal history moderate the effect of gender on sentence length in federal narcotics cases?." Criminal justice and behavior 42.7 (2015): 703-721.

So you're interested in equality of outcome

Starr, Sonja B. "Estimating gender disparities in federal criminal cases." American Law and Economics Review 17.1 (2014): 127-159.

Equality before the law requires anarcho-capitalism.

Equality before the law requires us to be ruled by NAZI PUGS!!!Q

No, I am interpreting what your saying like this: Asians commit murder at such a lower rate than blacks they can't really commit murder so don't bother investigating them

Yes, that's BS.

Its not really murder when they do it