Women can get sex more easily. which contributes in my opinion.

>if you're attracted you consent
>what's a viagra

I get what you mean

But then child send would be legal

By that logic

?? So she has to force feed the man a viagra first?

>nobody slips drugs into people's drinks ever

If a 90 yr old man had intercourse with a 12 yr old boi it is plausible for him to get an erection

So if a woman is aroused not rape?

can you slip viagra into a drink?

Yes

Are you sure about that

So I don’t think that should be a reason

There's like a million prank vids

whats the chemical composition of viagra

Of idiots giving their friends bonerdrank

Also in the one example the woman was force feeding viagra to the guy.

So what I'm seeing here is for it to be classified rape
1. The woman must be armed
2. The woman must first slip a viagra into his drink??

how many times has this happened

im betting close to 0

Wot

Gtg *sleep* if u catch my drift

No, to be classified as rape
>man doesn't consent to sex
>sex is had

Chas

*cyas

Arousal is not consent

How do I get 🅱erified?

Arousal is not consent <:TimThink:482277772497125378>

Why?

You can have a conflict of interests

many women who have been raped admitted to being aroused. still rape

>get turned on by someone
>decide you don't want to do it and say so
>they have sex with you anyway
Why would this be okay?

You can arouse men against their will, even without viagra.

Im not sure any of this is on the same level as forced penetration of a woman

Statutory rape is another case.

I wonder how many men have been legitimately raped by women?

not just #metoo i was having sex but then I didnt want to

I don't know.

And we won't know until the reporting is objective and the same for men as it is for women.

If the genders were reversed, there would be an outcry if a woman had to pay child support to her rapist.

I feel like a good 90% of men would have no problem being forced to have sex with a woman