Read the Bible

exactly chad

god bless you

Religion isn’t an argument in favor of ritual sacrifice as much as ritual sacrifice is an argument against religion

No it isn't

you can't use religion in a debate or argument

unless you are arguing over that religion

But on the other hand, I sort of feel like sacrificing @hcaez right now

yes you can

what do you say guys?

no

well then you would be a hypocrite visitor

I am

A proud hypocrite

well I can't quote exactly where in the old testament

I don't support things like that because killing a person for no reason is wrong.

You non believers are going to hell. Good riddance

but there was something

yep and you're going to heaven for wanting to kill people, totally

nice

It’s not wrong to kill a person if it’s in the name of god

Also if god demands us to kill them

are soldiers going to heaven for killing people if its their duty

are you going to heaven by aborting babies

it depends

i'm not a leftist

Yeah

i'm conservative

Instead of abortions we should just call them ritual sacrifices of fetuses

That argument makes no sense

That would be ok right?

yeah just say god told you to kill the baby

makes it all good

Yeah

Only if the parent is liberal

It says it somewhere in the New Testament

No.

not good visitor

nope

Stop putting anti-christian propaganda

Everytime a sacrifice involving a baby was occured, it happened after birth

and there was reason behind it

Let’s change that

This is the modern era

well

i don't know if that's possible

There is no anti-Christian propaganda, I am simply stating you can't use religion to justify killing someone.

We should carry out ritual sacrifices with our new scientific knowledge

okay then what can you use to justify killing someone

if they attack you and try to kill you, or if they did something extremely cruel and villainous.

not sacrificing an innocent person because "god said so"

why do you believe that's appropriate

Self-defense with no other options or as an instrument of a just law

If you’re an executioner

what gives you the right to end another's lives?

Nothing.

Or if you’re taking down a school shooter or something

Society at large can give you the right to end a life

Through government and laws

Because for one its self-defense and there's no other option, second if they did something like killed 10 people, and are a threat to society and there's no other option.

But that’s a really narrow window

Okay but why kill them? surely incapacitating them is both easier and doesn't involve taking one's life

Deaths are really only justified to prevent further deaths

That’s preferable imo

If you could just deactivate a school shooter with the same effectiveness as a gun we should switch to that

I would much prefer incarceration, I just give me extreme scenerios.

But that’s not certain

You know what I hate

Sometimes shooting them is the only effective way

What do you hate, Chad?

Why incarceration as a punishment?

Studies have shown it's not effective

When people try to say Muslims are radicals for wanting honor killings

To prevent them from menacing society and to rehabilitate them

unless it's life long

Yet honor killings aren’t bad

Because its the fairest punishment you can give for someone that's a menace to society

prisons rarely rehabilitate people

@chad As a library, you are disgracing me and should die

*libtard lamo

That’s like saying Trump is a radical Muslim for liking charity

how can you judge a punishment fair?

Taking someones life = 20 years?

Trump is a radical Mushroom for supporting ebola

Disgracing you for staying a fact? Sorry facts don’t care about your feelings snowflake.

that's a bit far visitor, stay civil unlike them.

Sorry, just fellow libtard banter

any response kylo

LOL

NOOOO T1

did you hear he quit league

@hcaez punishments should not be worse than crimes

good I’m about to quit also you can’t do honor killings so it offends my religious beliefs

that’s the general rule

what does that mean

Well if someone is a menace to society, and knows the punishment they will receive for their actions, its nobodies fault but theirs

the crimes that the punished commit?

but how's that fair then

Putting a limit on the scope of punishments to crime?

Because they know what's going to happen, yet they still do it. Incarceration is a fair punishment because it gives them a chance to rehabilitate and fix their life.

It seems to me that you’re saying ritual sacrifice is more humane than enforcing laws at all

no visitor, i was just trolling you

lol

Ok good

step up

Enforce the law of sacrificing people to god.

but seriously

What about this guy tho

Oh great now you're back

@Muffster is he trolling?

no It's a joke calm down

Phew

What I'm getting from this conversation is hypercriticism

You're saying that it's fair to establish law regarding punishment and expect people to not do bad things because of it

Hypocrite or hypercriticism?

They’re different things

While religious people use the same argument except using their bible

no its not the same

@chad they're a one hit kill.

Are you god in the regard of saying how people should be punished

pretty much muffster

**There is no god**

😎

laws are established by the government and are laid out for all the people

the people are then expected to follow them

this is how society works

couldn't you say the same thing about religion?

no you can't

Why

most people voluntarily take up religion

because people aren't forced/don't follow the same religion

there are many people who have no religion

that's fine they can establish their own system then

so if you were to enforce a religious ideal on people that don't follow it, its not fair.

didn't say that would happen, but now what

Ok bye

if all people agree to follow one religion what difference is that from the US gov?

there's a big difference, a government cannot operate without laws. While many people are fine without religion.

The bill of rights specifically gives people the right of religion choice

Wait did t1 actually quit league?

yes

that way they don't have to worry about someone oppressing their religion on them.

when

yesterday, he raged about adc being broken

That makes no sense

and said he would start doing variety again or something

He’s an adc

Shouldn’t he be happy

broken in a bad way

Oh

Is it on YouTube also good I miss his variety streams

just look on one of those league clip channels

@Kylo Ren what if that religious ideal is not raping an 8 year old

?

If a man rapes an 8 year old girl and the community come together and kill them and they call it an honor killing is it bad

Yes

How is it bad

He raped an 8 year old girl

because he should still have a chance at life, he commited a terrible crime that no person should ever even think about doing, but he is still a life and deserves a chance.

what I'm arguing is that we're all people, none of us are smart enough or just enough to create fair punishments

So ur against the death penalty?

even if we assemble into a government

No I am for it, under certain extreme circumstances

oh ok

extreme

same

LMFAO

Dear Fuck, it's real

I double checked as well, and can confirm

Obama is a porn star

It is real

Lol

He’s virtue signaling to gay nigaz

Rolf

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ what the FREAK

wait

Nevermind I stole it from you

continue 🦆

I don’t think the government shutdown is changing anyone’s political allegiances but it’s further polarizing right and left as they continue to point fingers at each other

Idk

agreed

based

We need help schooling some libs. message if your willing to join the fight

@TrumpCosby I’m not

I dont think women should be represents bad in historical games.

EA is ruining history games.

NEVER were there a black German women who fought in WW2.

A women with a bionic arm?

Even more stupid

Liberalism and feminism ruined history games

Liberalism has ruined the economy, society in general

There’s not one leftist policy that makes sense

True.

All I wanted. All I wanted... was Rey to be a sith and become kylo ren’s apprentice. But no... she has to be strong independent female hero thing.

Same

The liberal agenda made the movie decent

But no a women can NEVER be friends with an evil white straight male

Yeah! Down with the patriarchy! Nasty white males (kidding)

Extremists are what’s wrong with the world

Lucky i dont live in the USA

Nowdays i find communists supporting the taliban because they are against us imperialism

I'd say it is tolerance for evil that is what is wrong with the world, it takes an "extreme" person to do something that will actually matter.

Yea obungus its pretty neat to support a group which oppresses women

who gives a shit about women? LMAO

But ISIS claims itself to be anti imperialist, so whats the exception?

Your just a dogmatic 14 year old kid who plays COD and has a shitshow when it comes to politics, hows that?

not true

I think anyone that supports extremists groups fuel evil

I have never even once, seen you with any intricate knowledge of politics

but tell yourself what ever you want and start talking when you can understand a shitpost

It really is not funny when you troll about terrorism, it really isnt

That is because I do not conduct dialogue with the magapedes

I never supported terrorism

when did I say that?

I just said it sometimes takes a person with extreme views to meaningful things

which is simply true

Being a centrist reactionary gets us no where

You said it with the context of my statement lol

You think I read conversations before I join them?

So obviously if even if you didnt say it, it could be easily inferred

Or you could ask me for clarification

I dont have to

Your just a Logan 2.0

very cool sid!

I know you do not have to ask for clarification I am saying it would have been easier for you if you had

O

That was randomness

I didn’t see the messages above

lol

This e-girl got mad because she thought I supported the taliban

It xould be inferred as i said

Not much to clarify while being strikingly obvious

I wasn't even responding to you

Gonzalez had said extremism is what is wrong with the world and I responded to him

I think there’s a difference between being passionate and being extreme is all

When you’re passionate you get it done

When you’re extreme it’s “by any means necessary”

I’m talking about groups that incite violence of course

The Sons of Liberty were extremists, yes?

The difficulty with your definition of extremists as people who incite violence is that we all disagree on what that means

That is, extreme groups usually believe that violence has already been brought upon them

I mean like people that condone genocide

Some third wave feminist for instance that post “kill all men”

That is a more fair way to define evil, but political extremism can exist without genocide

Like I said I think there’s a clear difference between passionate and being extreme