So a right wing party is pro traditionalism, constitutionalism, etc

A left wing party would be pro secularism, social programs, etc

Those are non exclusionary

You can be secular, support the constitution, support social programs and value tradition

You can adopt a wide variety of ideologies under one banner without being cornered

And then, the people in the party can say "I'm a constitutionalist", or " I'm a socialist"

Further, what was no child left behind, as poor a plam as it was? And alt right memestate enthusiasts will often advocate a heavy welfare state

That's the thing. The lines are unclear

Aren't alt right people national socialists?

Not all, but altleast the ethnostatists

Some of them might be yes, and a heavy social welfare state is lefty

technocratic monarchy is the best, prove me wrong

So what's the righty aspect?

The alt right isn't a good example here

Even ethnonationalists aren't necessarily natsocs.

It's a perfect example

Because where do they go?

Vernacular recommendation: we need words more relative to the Overton window, and not the political compass.

They didn't start off this way. A bunch of nazis took over the actual alt right.

Okay, but where do you put Nazis?

The Alt-Right was Poland

Radical centrists

The Nazis annexed it

The nazis are radical centrists.

And the media basically said 'sure, they can have THAT title...'

What right wing positions do they have?

Monarchy

Closed borders

I'm not buying Monarchy as 'right'

Monarchy is an authoritarian branch.

Monarchy is more traditional.

The iron curtain was built by righties?

A hierarchical system based on tradition is definitely right.

By etymological standards it's the same as a dictator.

'Rule by one'

Not really

It's family rule

by etymological standards.

Mon- means one.

And north Korea is a republic

Do ethnostatists seek to seize the means of production?