Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 489747921235869697
It could've been the brits themselves, to false flag Russia so people get scared and support the government authority
Well as i said its weird story
Why the hell would China try to kill a ex Russian spy?
to create tension, so they aren't in the spotlight
Durring world cup
China benefits from europe and russian tensions
Yeah, the Russians know how much we like our football. It's a good time to burry a story. And that goes for the UK doing it too. They knew it wouldn't get half as much air time.
The point is with no actual evidence you can make any story
for all we know, Lauren Southern poisoned that spy, thats why she not allowed back into the UK <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
Exaclty, you can't say 'we don't have any evidence, so it could be anyone' that's not how this works.
I'd be more likely to believe it was the EU than the UK.
well what they do is
"We have no evidence, but we strongly SUSPECT Russians are behind this! So we condemn Russia"
Yes, you can do that without any evidence coz they have a track record of killing people on our soil and a record of killing ex-spies. Thats enough to take a closer look. I think they do have evidence but csan
can't show it.
Eu has no foreign agents tho
Eu countries do
But not eu
Might change in the future
Its enough to take a closer look, but they're not allowed to make an accusation without evidence given to back it up
I agree with doc here
Its like the muh russian hacked the elections
"This person committed treason"
Do you have any evidence of it?
Yes
Can we see it?
No
Thats like those Anonymous sources that CNN uses
Dont forget about the wmd in iraq
"An Anon, told us that the President wanted to watch the "Gorilla channel" and whispers to the winning gorilla close up the telivision"
😄
Gonna find them any moment now
dude the WMD in Iraq destroyed my faith in Government policing
"We suspect they have WMDs"
We didn't find any
"We suspect they have WMDs"
We checked again, didn't find any
"They have WMD's"
No
-Invade-
Yeah it was ilegal invasion
OK, yeah. Condemning them without showing evidence is going a bit far.
Its innocent until proven guilty
Not SJW/Government mentality of "Guilty until proven innocent"
Yes
thats how you get witch-hunts, and Gulags
"it was illegal invasion"
as if any invasion can be legal.
what about the Invasion of Normandy to liberate Europe from the Nazis? <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
Its an interesting legalistic problem
Both aproaches have their pros and cons
You know,
If America Nuked Germany at the end of WW2
We should have German Tentacle porn <:TimThink:482277772497125378>