He deserves real respect to be done right

Anyone here really into computers?

https://youtu.be/wz3Fw4SDsds

I left when the chat died aghh

I'd be talking more but doing a mixture of getting shit done and not getting shit done. It's a really intricate process

@R9b1t how do you mean "really into computers"?

being into them is, in some sense, a major part of my job.

Well I convinced my father you can download more ram without windows operating systems.

Moral of the story is I need a moderate computer for video games that I plan to use mostly for office work

But I’m not sure about brand or what I can run

@Timcast MGTOWs in general dont tend to be identitarians. Most MRAare also WRAs. Thats just not controversial enough to even state

@King Canuck I am still on the theory that Thanos was full of crap and still only wants in Death's pants.

If you dont want people *including men* to be tortured for no reason, guess what, you are a MRA.

Its just the noun to the verb of advocating for the rights of men

@ryuplaneswalker we'll see. The first canon novel to the MCU that's not an adaptation is going to be about Thano's life

so we'll see then

What do you mean by not wanting people to be tortured means you'rea a mgtow?

If you think people should not be tortured due to human rights, you are advocating for the rights of humans. Including men. That makes you a MRA.

I can understand saying that makes you an MRA, though I'd disagree just as I'd disagree if you said it makes you a feminist, but what does that have to do with men giving up on women?

Oops

my bad

let me change that

not that the mainstream sees much of a difference

They should.

Yes

They should

Sorry, im a bit buzzed

qwfuqwdgfiuqwefgoiuqweghriulyugirueyiruewh

As Styx reported, Spice is very dangerous.

In my experience it does seem like a very large percent of MRAs are political/sexual identitarians. It seems like the ones who would be in favor of men's rights but aren't identitarians are much more likely to call themselves egalitarians or humanists

tiy feele

?

no

@Schedrevka well the thing is,MRA is not a lable they made up. It was a labe

*lable feminists applied to MRAs and they accepted

What difference does that make? If you're forming your identity around your activism for men's rights and in being a man as your defining trait you're an identitarian.

to quote a prolific MRA "If you are not both an MRA and an WRA, you are not egalitarian, if you arent either, you are not a humanist"

But there is a difference between being an MRA and being for men's(and human's) rights, just as there's a difference between being for women's rights and being a feminist

yes?

So then that quote is false.

being for mens rights definatly does make you an MRA just as being for womens rights makes you a WRA