Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 497170278204440599
but if you strive for ideals cant that result in "the ends justify the means" cancer
the Ancap one i think?
is there another kind?
cause it's very confusing in contexts of Network Access Protection
idk ive only heard it mentioned by stefan moleneux
lol
NAP = Non-aggression Pact
ah
basically, we both agree not to attack each other
I like nap
its the Ancaps version of a peace treaty
We know the crazies based on who violates nap
dude i'd violate the NAP, fuck ancaps 😛
ancaps are way more defensible than socialism at least
they are not, they're just as delusional
all you do is divide up the nation into smaller "personal spaces"
I also played a game where everyone has naps with everyone, until someone decides to dump their girlfriend, then we broke the game due to everyone warring with everyone
The yeoman farmer is superior to the anarcho capitalist
yeah actually tbh any kind of anarchy is unhuman
we need leaders because most people are followers
ancaps will be destroyed by a Warlord who gets a big faction
what differentiates ancaps from minarchists?
ancaps don't want a state
they basically want a capitalist form of communism
capitalist form of communism
No state, everyone fends for themselves
<:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
lol
but theres no requirement to be nice and give to others
yea
Basically, You want protection? Hire people as guards
You want production? Hire people to tend to your farms
We must all pursue the agrarian idyll
Can't people organize without the state?
They can, on a small scale
Microsoft seems to be a pretty big scale.
but then you just get a militant warlord who will crush you cuz he's got an army to step on you
take your wealth
The state is required to ensure that the rights of man are not violated
and set himself as king