So that's not a feasible solution unless there's a giant cultural shift

"You know, mind control is such a hard thing to prove. We do not convict a lot of people for it. Let's just believe the accusers and invent a bunch of bullshit laws that prevent the defense from asking for mental records of the accuser."

AWESOME!

Read my lips:

I DO NOT FUCKING CARE HOW HARD IT IS TO PROVE.

Calm down, I agree with you

I know.

I am not yelling AT you.

I am more ... yelling at the collective human stupidity.

I just want a feasible solution. Not prosecuting these cases isn't one of them.

Maybe an entirely anonymous secret system of accusations and courts

Yes, it IS a solutin.

It is the only solution.

No evidence? Fuck off then.

Where the Jury and the judge only hears the statements and doesn't know who the accuser and the accused are

The whole reason why we think that way is because we cannot hold women accountable.

I think that might help

If child abduction was a problem, we would investigate better, and not let our kids walk out at night.

Lowering the standards of evidence would be the LAST thing we should do.

Think of it this way. Imagine the kav case, except no one knew who either the accuser or the accused were

The only thing put out would be the statements and evidence

Is child abduction hard to prove if there is no evidence? Yes!
Would I be pissed if I thought I knew who abducted my child and couldn't prove it? Yes!

The case would have been proven long ago

But that is what our justice system is for: To go on evidence and follow due process, not to satisfy your thirst for revenge of who you perceive wronged you.

Undead Mockingbird's rule for rape prosecution:

No fucking evidence? No fucking prosecution!

Cases being behind closed doors has precedent, but it's very narrow. The 6th amendment guarantees a public trial.

Europe has very private court cases and it sorta works.

The reason for public trials is to insure transparency and avoid a China scenario.

There are ways to run these trials and keep details sealed (in a way that's 6th amendment compliant).

But I think that's not really the point for a lot of these people.

Think cases done like 4chan

And the only people who're allowed to know the accuser and the accused are the defendant and prosecutor

That's not really practical.

I haven't thought it out

You would be able to peice together who the people are based on presented evidence.

Like, if there's addresses for example.

Or vehicles involved.

With license plates.

It would be extremely hard to censor enough to prevent court watchers from figuring out who's being talked about.

There are ways to frame things without revealing enough info to find the people

Not really.

You can hide for a little while.

But as evidence enters, it becomes dramatically harder with each new piece of evidence.

It's really not hard to unmask someone if you've got the time, money and know-how.