Message from @Slav
Discord ID: 290423814532104193
I'm guessing you'll disagree, because it's a pretty unpopular position to hold.
But I gave up on the "free marketplace of ideas" thing some time ago.
I'm really not interested in talking to those I consider degenerate anymore. Which would be anyone who isn't a nationalist. At least in a civic form.
I'm sure a good deal of them can be converted, which is good and should be done.
But I recognize a good chunk of them cannot be saved.
To a degree I disagree, but to a degree I don't. In a perfect world, a free market place of ideas would ensure that the best ideas get to the top, ie. our ideas. However, the existence of the media has precluded this, because whoever controls it holds control over how people think and what is hegemonic. I would like to get them out of the way and restore a real "free market", but even then I recognize that many would still disagree with me, at which point I simply demand separation. But I could also just take control of media and as they have to me, use it to make them think like how I want. In that way, I suppose Im not so much a fan of the free market of ideas. I know the vast majority of people are simply programming, and so I just want the means to program them correctly.
O, and as for Stefan. Skip to 7:38
The issue I take with the free marketplace of ideas is that I don't have faith in people to make the right choice. I know if not for a stroke of luck I would have been a socialist today. I was in fact.
I know how it is to be lead astray.
I know how easy it is to be lead astray*
As I said, the sad fact of the matter, is that people by and large think what they are taught to think.
As far as I'm concerned, once the truth (in terms of politics) gets into power, parents should indoctrinate their children on some things.
So, it then simply becomes a war over controlling what is implanted into peoples heads.
naturally
For example, questioning your loyalty to your people is anathema. Some things simply cannot be allowed to even be entertained.
agreed
Strong tribal identity is important to be imbued. As well as an concomitant sense of honor and loyalty to that trive
you really should watch the end of that molyneux video by the way if you havent
He all but names the Jew lol
Hehe yeah, well if he converts his base over time - it will be great. He did go from an Ayn Rand nutcase to this. So I'm hopeful.
He has exhibited extreme intellectual integrity. If the evidence says it is the case, he begrudgingly comes to accept it.
This is rare in someone who also possesses such a strong sense of humanitarianism and morality such as Stefan. I respect him for this immensely. He's a softy, but he has the will to accept hard and often illiberal truths.
I'm gonna go to bed man, its late as shit here. Peace... wait, what the fuck am I saying? *ahem* War
Haha
Sure, take care man.
Gn.
@Slav What do you think Race realism is useful for?
I think its good to acknowledge because (1) its scientific and (2) it allows us to logically handle problems that subgroups/races/tribes are predisposed to.
But, just talking about IQ vs criminality without coming up with solutions from the evidence makes race realists/realistic racists look hateful, when they may not be.
Logic = Villainy.
“Wilders understands that culture and demographics are our destiny. We can’t restore our civilization with somebody else’s babies,” Steve King tweeted.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/12/the-internet-blows-up-over-gop-reps-tweet-about-immigration/#ixzz4bE92tcnu
Eagle in the background looks SPQR
Fashy
Good tweet
Truth
He seems like a stand up guy, at least at that moment.
He kept it real.
Race realism? I'm not sure how to answer your question.
It's just the truth. What we want to do with it is another topic.
Imo it serves as another reason why not to mix races anymore than is absolutely necessary.
Or if we do want to mix, we should want to mix up rather than down.
Uh, you talking about IQ when you say up and not down?
Yes. Amongst other things.