Message from @Dangerlurking

Discord ID: 299633573433180170


2017-04-06 19:54:26 UTC  

@Heliodromus Shingen There's only so much consistent inconsistency before we can conclude sadism as the primary motives

2017-04-06 19:54:30 UTC  

hmm

2017-04-06 19:54:37 UTC  

seems kinda suspicious to me

2017-04-06 19:54:54 UTC  

State Department had fucking social media tweets about this back in 2015/2014

They removed all of the chemical weapons from Syrian military forces back then. It was the "freedom fighters"

2017-04-06 19:55:16 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/276935978369810432/299633178396852244/439.jpeg

2017-04-06 19:55:18 UTC  

Probably

2017-04-06 19:55:22 UTC  

Probably?

2017-04-06 19:55:24 UTC  

>Tfw when globalists want to set up a pro FSA government in syria but end up at war with russia

2017-04-06 19:55:30 UTC  

It probably wasn't assad.

2017-04-06 19:55:37 UTC  

Said freedom fighters already used chemical weapons last year

2017-04-06 19:55:37 UTC  

Not enough proof yet.

2017-04-06 19:55:46 UTC  

I remember the reports that only Russia Today published

2017-04-06 19:56:05 UTC  

yeah, so even if it WAS assad, we would be removing him to help people just as bad.

2017-04-06 19:56:16 UTC  

But the whole thing is super suspicious.

2017-04-06 19:56:21 UTC  

What fucking idiot

2017-04-06 19:56:24 UTC  

who is winning a war

2017-04-06 19:56:35 UTC  

Assad has been the only ruler left in the Middle East actually fighting terror groups

2017-04-06 19:56:36 UTC  

who is winning politically

2017-04-06 19:56:43 UTC  

drops chemical weapons

2017-04-06 19:56:46 UTC  

on children

2017-04-06 19:56:50 UTC  

@Heliodromus Shingen What about iraq and iran?

2017-04-06 19:57:00 UTC  

95% chance it was the rebels.

2017-04-06 19:57:10 UTC  

Iraq has been done since Hussein was taken out, and Iran still funds various terror groups

2017-04-06 19:57:13 UTC  

Or Assad and his people are super incompetent

2017-04-06 19:57:14 UTC  

can anyone suggest a page that will give me the rundown on syria?

2017-04-06 19:57:28 UTC  

/sg/ on /pol/ is probably going fucking nuts

2017-04-06 19:57:37 UTC  

I really dont know why people are hating him, he is just finish the middle east.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/276935978369810432/299633769197862912/Good_trade.gif

2017-04-06 19:58:58 UTC  

Tfw you bomb a hospital and gas people but the blame goes to syria and the US invades and sets up your gov as the new one http://i.alalam.ir/news/Image/original/2013/08/25/alalam_635130223997873316_25f_4x3.jpg

2017-04-06 19:59:59 UTC  

@TopHatt Ultra quick rundown is that Assad's bad but the alternatives are worse for the syrians and for a terrorist free west, but Assad is freindly with russia. (((Powerful people))) want to build a pipeline to Europe through syria from the middle east, which would make russia uncompetative as an oil suplier. Assad is against this. So the (((Powerful people))) want to remove him.

2017-04-06 20:00:47 UTC  

*REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE*

2017-04-06 20:00:50 UTC  

Either "kurdistan" is going to be set up or FSA will.

2017-04-06 20:00:53 UTC  

How can Assad be bad when that region isn't going to spawn anything good to begin with?

2017-04-06 20:01:28 UTC  

so the west wants oil but a leader's in the way so they're choosing oil and big terrorism over moderate terrorism?

2017-04-06 20:01:28 UTC  

Just because you are the best shit doesn't mean you aren't a shit

2017-04-06 20:01:29 UTC  

@Heliodromus Shingen Muh barrel bombs

2017-04-06 20:01:55 UTC  

@TopHatt Since when do the leaders suffer the effects of the violence?

2017-04-06 20:02:00 UTC  

@TopHatt No, under Assad syria has been pretty terrorist free I think.

2017-04-06 20:02:08 UTC  

@TopHatt Any oil fields in syria have been bombed to hell or have been destroyed from artillery, there is no point in it anymore.

2017-04-06 20:02:16 UTC  

@TopHatt They don't care because they have bodyguards and bunkers.

2017-04-06 20:02:20 UTC  

Its the pipeline.