@Dangerlurking And they likely don't care.

fuck this, I dont believe a word the MSM says anyway

>people thinking that this was meant to work out and not just a globalist plot to bleed burgerland dry

>when USA invading Syria instead of invading China
just WHY

@Heliodromus Shingen Entirely possible at this point.

>possible

Nigger, it is

quick rundown:
>chemical weapons dropped on syria
>no evidence as to who is responsible
>everyone blames assad
>anti-assad jurnalist tweeted a day before that they were going to start reporting on the story
>trump says "this changes things"
>Kremlin says their support of Assad is not unconditional
>Secretary of State blames assad and says that they are going after assad?

@Heliodromus Shingen There's only so much consistent inconsistency before we can conclude sadism as the primary motives

hmm

seems kinda suspicious to me

State Department had fucking social media tweets about this back in 2015/2014

They removed all of the chemical weapons from Syrian military forces back then. It was the "freedom fighters"

@Lord Joe

Probably

Probably?

>Tfw when globalists want to set up a pro FSA government in syria but end up at war with russia

It probably wasn't assad.

Said freedom fighters already used chemical weapons last year

Not enough proof yet.

I remember the reports that only Russia Today published

yeah, so even if it WAS assad, we would be removing him to help people just as bad.

But the whole thing is super suspicious.

What fucking idiot

who is winning a war

Assad has been the only ruler left in the Middle East actually fighting terror groups

who is winning politically

drops chemical weapons

on children

@Heliodromus Shingen What about iraq and iran?

95% chance it was the rebels.

Iraq has been done since Hussein was taken out, and Iran still funds various terror groups

Or Assad and his people are super incompetent

can anyone suggest a page that will give me the rundown on syria?

/sg/ on /pol/ is probably going fucking nuts

I really dont know why people are hating him, he is just finish the middle east.

Tfw you bomb a hospital and gas people but the blame goes to syria and the US invades and sets up your gov as the new one http://i.alalam.ir/news/Image/original/2013/08/25/alalam_635130223997873316_25f_4x3.jpg

@TopHatt Ultra quick rundown is that Assad's bad but the alternatives are worse for the syrians and for a terrorist free west, but Assad is freindly with russia. (((Powerful people))) want to build a pipeline to Europe through syria from the middle east, which would make russia uncompetative as an oil suplier. Assad is against this. So the (((Powerful people))) want to remove him.

*REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE*

Either "kurdistan" is going to be set up or FSA will.

How can Assad be bad when that region isn't going to spawn anything good to begin with?

so the west wants oil but a leader's in the way so they're choosing oil and big terrorism over moderate terrorism?