Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 501730310149505034
WAT
😂
yeah
Start the helicopters!
nice one
when the muslims come for bacon.... then people will truly rise up!
🚁 <[ <:commie:463087263153258506> ]
you know i think i finally figured out a big part of why the Western Left doesn't go after Islamic Institutions and Organization
oh?
I think a big part of that is that most Islamic Countries don't have real Democracy, they don't have the kind of New Left to legitimize and normalize anti Islamic positions in Middle East which can then be imported to the West
Like for example, there have been recent cases where these leftist organizations in US and in colleges started protesting World Hindu Congress as Fascist
It's because there's this Leftist narrative in India that Hindu Revivalism is leading to "Far Right Populism" there.. they share this Ideology with Western Leftists and there you have it becoming more mainstream.
Nah its the fact theres no "great causes" to stand for in the west,
So they stand up for causes somewhere else, but they dont wanna actually GO there and work for it, they rather sit at home and drink soy-milk
There isn't an organized Subversive Left in the Muslim World who can share these anti Islamic ideas to the West, so the Left Muslims just appear a United Oppressed Minority group, they don't see a left and a right in them..
and ofc pure ignorance
but mate, they literally shut down Hindu speakers in Oxford just speaking about Hindu Civilization n all that.. they'd never even dream of doing that to Muslims, what do you think the difference is?
well here is my issue with the religion of peace: its is extremly conservative and authoritarian let almost always sides with the Left. you cant be liberal and conservative. thats voting for an adgenda
also taqia
or however its spelt
the difference is they dont see the media report that the US is bombing hindus
that the most oppressed people is the ones being bombed
People complaining about taqqiya barely know anything about it
in Urdu taqiya actually means Pillow
I'm no islam supporter, but that's one of the stupidest things to talk about regarding islam
you get to lie about your faith and practices
Considering only shia muslims are taught to do it, and they are rarelyt the ones commiting murder
I get its origins however its weaponised in the west
and the million other things people complain about
hang on... lets mix oppression Olympics and outcome equality nuts .... we're all equally oppressed now... time to get on with our lives
yay equality \o/
only thing everyone can have in abundance equally, is misery
as for what you said Wacka,
Why do you think its a race to the bottom for these people?
the more oppressed you are, the more free stuff you get
actually the sunni do it too
so its a race to be the absolute bottom
Not at all
Hell, they aren't even taught about it
Sunni Islam view
The basic principle of taqiyya is agreed upon by scholars, though they tend to restrict it to dealing with non-Muslims and when under compulsion (ikrāh), while Shia jurists also allow it in interactions with Muslims and in all necessary matters (ḍarūriyāt).[39] In Sunni jurisprudence protecting one's belief during extreme or exigent circumstances is called idtirar (إضطرار), which translates to "being forced" or "being coerced", and this word is not specific to concealing the faith; for example, under the jurisprudence of idtirar one is allowed to consume prohibited food to avoid starving to death.[40] Additionally, denying one's faith under duress is "only at most permitted and not under all circumstances obligatory".[9] Al-Tabari comments on sura XVI, verse 106 (Tafsir, Bulak 1323, xxiv, 122): "If any one is compelled and professes unbelief with his tongue, while his heart contradicts him, in order to escape his enemies, no blame falls on him, because God takes his servants as their hearts believe." This verse was recorded after Ammar Yasir was forced by the idolaters of Mecca to recant his faith and denounce the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Al-Tabari explains that concealing one's faith is only justified if the person is in mortal danger, and even then martyrdom is considered a noble alternative. If threatened, it would be preferable for a Muslim to migrate to a more peaceful place where a person may practice their faith openly, "since God's earth is wide."[9] In Hadith, in the Sunni commentary of Sahih al-Bukhari, known as the Fath al-Bari, it is stated that:[41]
no not at all....
Indeed. I've read the books given in muslim schools