Message from @JULZIFICATOR
Discord ID: 502336169170698251
If is a MMO game called Blade and Soul.
Great game... she is a Kung Fu master.
Her class is Lyn Bladedancer.
She dances with a sword.
Yeah and you never trust anyone who plays a lyn <.<
What’s a lyn
an excuse to play a loli <.<
Alien
MMO pedobait
Ah, Korean
XD all valid
ya gotta count the tails when it comes to asiatic mythos involving foxes
You guys are speaking a foreign language. But if you have something against 7000 yo dragon girls get the fuck out of my face
There is male lyns too... it is a full blown race.
“Loli should be illegal”
• ᠌ ᠌ •
᠌ ⎳
᠌᠌ ᠌ ▬
You can have rabbits, foxes, wolves, teady bears, etc, etc...
a race to see how borderline pedo u can get
prettymuch
at least htey got diversity
I'm more worried about the collection of posed pictures
Characters in games are w/e
But y'know
The emotes in this game is kinda sexual.
So yeah, it is hard to find a pose that isn't sexual.
Someday that swat team will break in
And they'll find that folder
mixing furry and loli
And well
Do to all the busty females in this game.
It'll be...difficult to defend
There is one race that is purely women... like valkyries, Amazons....
that sounds like multiple races
Okay, here we go: Discord has changed their Terms of Service!
Unfortunately, this change comes with a revocation of your legal rights. Discord has revoked your right to sue (you must go through an arbitrator) and to congregate as a class action lawsuit.
Luckily, there is an opt-out for the clause, in which you must email [email protected], but you must do it within 30 days or you can no longer opt-out.
YOU CANNOT DELETE OR DEACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT TO OPT-OUT OF THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE
You can see the added clauses for yourself here: https://gist.github.com/Rapptz/c93697c9d59ec2f0d8071b7d0e907632
I will attempt to answer some common questions.
Is this enforceable?
In the United States, yes. This was decided by the Supreme Court in 2011. See https://gc.gy/7538114
In Europe, no. There are many clauses, a relevant one is Article 77 of the GDPR ("Right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority").
Why does this matter?
Without the ability to congregate for a class action lawsuit, if Discord ever leaks your data or does something catastrophically bad to a large portion of the population you have no way to representatively sue together without each of you individually suing via the arbitrator.
Please see the following article: https://gc.gy/7538130
Essentially:
1. Your right to file a complaint in the court of law is removed.
2. The arbitration system tends to heavily favour the company rather than the consumer.
3. Since your right to pool similar complaints together is taken away, the amount of damage you can do to a company that has wronged you significantly is limited to those who are willing to arbitrate.
Why should I care? Other companies do it too!
By learning about this I hope that you will be more conscious about these arbitration clauses and how anti-consumer they are. You can't change the past, but you surely can't predict the future either.
Lyns are the gnomes of this game.
thanks richard
Did you guys already know?
uhhhhhhhhh
i mean i know about these sort of policies