^

But it's not a bad thing for a population group to have a Lower IQ in and of itself.

stiiiiiiillll on this...

its not that it's bad, its that theres no utility in it

ultimately "race" itself is moot

But theres a correlation between races and IQ

what does it change?

eugenics?

you guys need your own channel or something

Heh

Look kyle we already have an issue here atm

we have this channel Wacka

i mean, i look at utility

knowledge is utility

its not that i disagree with genetic components

we have problems with people who arent that smart and cant find a job anymore because the job market has shifted to high level jobs

you just dont think they matter much

but i disagree that nurture isnt a big piece of the pie

but functionally

Nurture isn't just food, its also teaching a person

you only benefit from ONLY addressing nurture when rearing a child

its maybe 40% or something

dude genetics matter

you lift at all?

Its a mix

@Kyle Judkins You cannot turn a 65 IQ person into a scientist by sending them to College with 120 IQ people, that's the utility of this data.

you could take all the GH and anabolics you want

the social sciences will tell you its 80% or close to 100%

you'll never be hafthor

and suprise, some of the strongest mother fuckers are all icelandic

iceland has a pop like 300k or some shit

my town in florida has that

Genetics leave you with your biological limit

Working at it and learning allows you to reach taht limit as opposed to staying behind

Nurtuing allows your brain to be healthy so you can pick it up faster

yeah dr wol

your distortion of definition is stupid

nurture is anything you do to actively influence it

thats the classic "nature vs nurture"

you're the one distorting it, by claiming IQ == knowledge

nurture is influence of any kind

holy fuck you're thick

i never said that

look who's talking