This topic will not go anywhere if discussed in this way. You can do good and bad things in the name of science and in the name of religion.

If we want to make sensible comparisons, we have to discuss its methods.

religion gives people a purpose greater than their own

for people who can't think of a purpose for themselves

What is our standard? My standard is how accurate each is at making sense of reality.

i dono i think its kinda the other way around

ideas have people

lol transgenderism as a social construct

The scientific method has an undeniable track record and where it conflicts with religion should supersede it.

checkmate

The scientific institutions, on the other hand, and our scientific knowledge, is imperfect. We have gender studies.

It is the difference between algorithm and implementation.

but thats the result of post-modernism which me and atkins discussed just now

A sorting implementation can be wrong, but it's algorithm, on paper, can still be correct.

The scientific method has been shown to be very good, but its implementation is lacking a lot of times.

people wanting gender studies to be a science, cuz they see it as being a science, that they decide the rules for

Yes.

And it can be disproven with science.

yes

The scientific method can show wether it is nonsense.

Which distinguishes the body of scientific knowledge from the scientific method.

but tahts the difference between "truth" as seen by post-modernists and normal modernists

If it is "truth" that cannot be tested, it's not science.

post-modernists don't see truth. they think it's a meaningless word

If I cannot test post-modernism, it has no relevance to me.

Alrighr bois

Bombs have also been sent to a Republican newspaper

too late

I can also make up a new Mathematical operator. It can be without contradiction and perform operations, but that does not mean I have made any showings about reality.

we already have a hashtag

we're not changing the narrative now

send bombs to yourself to own the libs/cons

#magabomber

Oh shet

- Normal modernists see truth as proven by science, the scientific method is the authority on truth
- Post modernists see "truth" as subjective, everyone has their own truth, cuz everyone has a different perspective,

hence there is no authority on what is truth, and everyone can just set "truth" as what they believe in

So Trump is gonna get shot by #magabomber

as such they reject the scientific method

@Dr.Wol Well, then "truth" has been divorced from reality.

I have no used for such a "truth"

I cannot test it, it's irrelevant.

exactly

just like Atkins said