Message from @bandet
Discord ID: 690784316480946196
What do you guys think:
Will we see more, or less births 9months from now?
One argument is that the people now due to the lockdowns are spending a whole lot more time together. Couples especially.
My argument is that it's the opposite because of the uncertainty of the future, couples will rather wait a year or longer to see what are their odds.
Yeah many don’t know how long this will last so it’s better to not take chances
its a nothing burger
only people at risk should be quarantined
But then you do exactly the same
R0= most likely 6 or 7 or even higher
I mean, I get it. It's hard to accept the harsh reality.
"imagine not having a body like me and not being 190cm"
https://discordapp.com/channels/462008211378012160/680587502918041623/689481643949293569
https://discordapp.com/channels/462008211378012160/678531385123667998/689481635107962886
https://discordapp.com/channels/462008211378012160/678530619621507073/689481550382891121
"I am a 191cm tall blue eyed blonde haired norwegian."
https://discordapp.com/channels/462008211378012160/622430298746912768/690651065544081468
"Im just a 24 year old guy with a 100k usd car and my own home. And a hot girlfriend soon to be wife."
https://discordapp.com/channels/462008211378012160/680587502918041623/690680263050657843
"Im 25 and I have 6 potential girls i can call and 7 i dumped last year"
https://discordapp.com/channels/462008211378012160/678530619621507073/689486188838387750
@ETBrooD This one exudes big LARP energy, on par with BKP
top kek
biggus dickus style
> Fiscal Impact by Race in 2018
Updated article based on recent data
Thanks **Ford**, that saved me some time.
@Monstrous Moonshine
Check it out if you haven't
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aVe2vGhznk
<:powerful:595334910764515338>
Not a moral nihilist, but JF won this. Stefan kept strawmanning and misunderstanding objective morality vs subjective moral preferences stemming from evolution.
Sorry, jf kept retreating to alternative fictional universes where he was right because he wasnt right in the current one. He couldnt admit rape is wrong and he accepted he is on the same moral standing as a child rapist. That's a complete defeat. You dont get to the point where your ideology excuses child rape and get to say you "won" anything.
Rape being wrong is not subjective. Its objective. Because if rape wasnt wrong it wouldnt be rape. It's a contradiction.
All judgements are subjective.
Well I just explained how that's wrong. Rape is objectively bad because if its consensual it's not rape.
There is no good rape.
Is your argument that lack of consent makes something inherently bad?
Muhammad would like a word with you
muhammad is immoral.
From what I know, children aren't consenting to adults feeding them whatever they put on the table. Yet we don't consider that bad.
feeding isn't rape.
But your argument is that rape is bad because it's not consent.
@bandet I'm a Perennial Traditionalist and do believe that there are objective grounds for morality, but all I'm saying is that the particular debate was won by JF since his arguments were more sound and not properly addressed by Molyneux.
If you're arguing that only the lack of consent is what makes something bad, then you'd have to consider many other things bad, too.
Including children not having a choice in the matter of what food they eat.
In fact the 4 things listed by Molyneux which formed the basis for his moral theory were very much common throughout history and still are in many different civilizations
murder was constant throughout history. not moral.
Murder was, at times, considered morally acceptable, even admirable.
and the people who consider murder moral are not moral
It also doesn't matter what the majority thinks, that's not what makes something moral or immoral.
im sure theres an alternate universe where jf won, but it isn't this one!