Freud was wrong on a lot of things

Try reading a book by freud. @Hexidecimark

@ETBrooD Everyone is.

Eh, no

I've read more of Jung

Einstein was mostly right. Freud was very often wrong. And the list of his mistakes is only increasing, Einstein's is not.

Are you even serious? Einstein was wrong about a lot of stuff <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

the fuck

Ever heard of space time? Literally a nonsensical theory.

One example? You said "a lot"

Well he didn't actually do that much

Freud was wrong on one of his most central concepts

Some of his previously thought wrong ideas also come back later being considered right again

Space time was one of his big things

@ETBrooD Can you give an example of something freud was wrong about?

I think a good way to put it is that Freud was explanatory but he's not scientific because he never tried to be predictive.

Freud thought that if you accidentally say a word that you didn't mean to say, it reveals something about your true self

> I think a good way to put it is that Freud was explanatory but he's not scientific because he never tried to be predictive.
@Hexidecimark Says the person who I seriously doubt has read any freud

> Freud thought that if you accidentally say a word that you didn't mean to say, it reveals something about your true self
@ETBrooD That's a real thing though. It isn't always true but sometimes it is.

Freudian slips are definitely real.... <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

It's a BS theory, because it can't be proven.

I've read him in several psych classes, he's not someone who ends up being terribly practical to read

Like I said I've done more with Jung

No theory in psychology can really be proven

Freudian slips are not valid, they're statistical anomalies that are normal and are supposed to happen.

I'm 100% sure that they're real, but whatever man

If nothing in psychology can be proven, then psychology is not science

You're telling me you've never had a Freudian slip? <:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>

Not once in my entire life

@ETBrooD That's not how science works

Yes that is how it works. A theory that can't be proven is not a scientific theory. Falsification is *neccessary* for a scientific theory.

"science" in this context is synonymous with the scientific method. It does not require proof

Are you trolling me?

The scientific method is designed to generate proof my dude

LOL

Phad just posted an infographic that contradicts his claim

This is science

"test with an experiment" => proof of concept

No I didn't. <:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>

> "test with an experiment" => proof of concept
@ETBrooD <:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>

Your question marks aren't helping you make an argument