@Spectre9 Your explanation was really weak and mine is better.

You guys made the biggest mistake

@Scribblehatch you failed as soon as you jumped in.

Remember these words.

I never started a land war in Asia.

wrong Spectre9,

You don't know enough if "a god exists"

But any religion of humanity can be disproven 😉

An object will always follow the path of least resistance. All macroeconomic propositions that can't be reduced to microeconomic propositions are invalid. Individualism is scalable. Collectivism is unable to distinguish between the whole and its parts. The only valid collectivist claim is that the cosmos is uniform and static, but action is meaningless from this perspective. God does not act. Humans act. The natural sciences are a subset of praxeology.

**Newton’s Flaming Laser Sword.**

/iamverysmart incomming

If it cannot be proven through experimentation, it shouldn’t be argued about at all.

As for Dr. Wol, you kinda can’t do either, so it’s unworthy of discussion.

but it can be disproven by logic, cuz every religion known to man is self-contradictary

I'll tell the art majors to pack their bags.

Spectre has spoken.

I would like to know why?

But that doesn’t really disprove anything Dr.

Self-contradiction doesn't prove invalidity?

Personally I think that God is an idea. Not a thing

Shoot man, this is is some next level stuff.

You can use your logic but that doesn’t exactly solve it.

Ideas are things, unless you're using the words differently.

"That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"

Experimentation is the least reliable way to prove anything.

Without God it's impossible to be where we are.

Scientism is the worst religion

without god we'd be further ahead than where we are now

Without god we wouldn’t have pedo priests

What about Scientology?

Dismissed without evidence, Wol.

```Without god ---```

Bookworm this is not debate class

@Cody Oh fuck you.

Ok now, you can stop ganging up on people. You’re starting to show signs of an SJW group-mind.

Clearly, this is general.

Those are the rules of debate class because they're the rules of SANE ARGUMENTS.

You disregard them, you disregard sanity.

Fuck your ear.

Also, a flippant use of his literal last statement.

👂 🍆

Aside from me discussing with Codes, i didn't see other people really "gang up" on anyone

I’ll fuck You.