Message from @Scribblehatch
Discord ID: 505598873570377739
programming requires experience
Here is how neural networks are usually trained:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/963041/data-sets-for-neural-network-training
There needs to be a slow down in experiencing and learning.
no, i am questioning, because that's what i do
The faster you experience things, the less you care about what you learned.
We don't really know how to make AI "care".
i dont believe AI will
It's more of a statistical process right now.
like even a little
you guys are trying to apply human aspects onto an AI, without even understanding the human aspects
Neural networks are kind of like stochastic filters.
I want to see if an AI will figure out how to give me a rub and tug
it's like, MMkay. gl
Caring = Sympathetic understanding of shared experience.
It learns by doing something like statistical analysis. For example, in order to recognize chairs, you will have to feed it hundreds of chair images and eventually it recognizes the relative distribution of key features.
It would be better to have a human aspect in AI, then a AI with no human aspect at all.
great, what's that mean?
start there
But, the amazing thing is that a child can learn what a chair is just by seeing one or two chairs.
That it could be compassion, sympathetic, and understanding to our wants, needs, and feelings.
Chairs are incredible.
Currently, the brain of a four year old is more advanced than the best AI.
Beyond a child's comprehension.
im none of those things to you
am I human?
negative
It won't see us as objects to use....
You know that video of the jerking off robot
you are a meat popcicle
But its angle was too high
That’s funny
Even the Google AI still needs hundreds of images to recognize objects reliably.
But if you show a child two chairs and then a beanbag chair afterwards can it identify the beanbag chair as a chair?
Im a yeet popsicle
is a chair a chair if you don't sit on it?
Here is a tutorial:
AI needs to understand context.