Message from @Tykiller

Discord ID: 507052505050382347


2018-10-31 04:40:00 UTC  

Taquitos . . . why are you labeling voting like having access?

2018-10-31 04:40:52 UTC  

to me, voting was explained as you owning your vote

2018-10-31 04:41:22 UTC  

```diff
+a wild npc has appeared.
-data input not compatible with programing
-unable to comprehend inputted responses

-Engage target```

2018-10-31 04:41:24 UTC  

i'm not sure how it can be seen as somehow 'borrowing' a vote

2018-10-31 04:41:50 UTC  

@Beef Taquitos I think the point he is making is like - You have the "right" to healthcare but the level of care and access is different for each person and not a "right"

2018-10-31 04:42:05 UTC  

It's equal rights however it's not equal responsibility.

2018-10-31 04:42:30 UTC  

yeah sorry my words can't reach your programming

2018-10-31 04:42:31 UTC  

god forbid

2018-10-31 04:42:32 UTC  

Voting requirements were trucated to allow women as it previously required signing up for the draft. The problem here, is that women should have the right to vote, but I also don't think the requirements should have been lowered. Not helpful for a good decision

2018-10-31 04:42:44 UTC  

>>>
If men have to sign up for selective service to be allowed to vote and women don't, that isn't equal rights. End of story.
<<<

2018-10-31 04:42:57 UTC  

100% agree.

2018-10-31 04:43:27 UTC  

It's only not an equal right to men who don't sign up for selective service.

2018-10-31 04:43:43 UTC  

It really should be that cut and dry. I find it baffling what kind of mental gymnastics we engage in, be it left or right, for the sake of avoiding the cognitive dissonance of our gynocentrism.

2018-10-31 04:43:47 UTC  

However it does expand the right to women, with less responsibility on them.

2018-10-31 04:44:06 UTC  

no theyre not.
Today a women can sleep with a man and in retrospect declare it rape because she was drunk. The fact the man was drunk as well is considered irrelevant.
Even when these cases get declared as BS, its the man that gets his entire social & professional life ruined whilst the women is hailed as a hero for bringing this forward.

That is called an unequal situation because society is so deeply gynocentric that they would rather put a thousand innocent men in prison than to lock 1 women up for lying her ass off to save face.

That is called having equal rights but not taking on equal responsibilities.
Her own responsibility of getting herself that drunk is put aside on the guy, because in the end he shouldve known better regardless of his own mental state at the time.
What paglia argued for is for it to be able to get drunk as a women AND take responsibility for any actions taken with it.

We dont suddenly declare a women driving drunk as the fault of the man, but in interactions it always is the presumption being made.

2018-10-31 04:44:57 UTC  

I am so glad I don't have to fight this uphill battle today, in order to show the staggering, blatant bias in favor of women.

2018-10-31 04:45:07 UTC  

Thats where im coming from and why paglia gets it right.

2018-10-31 04:45:09 UTC  

Look. Two people can have the equal right to do something while accepting different responsibilities. The right to vote is the right to vote. The unequal responsibilities behind it are unequal responsibilities.

2018-10-31 04:45:27 UTC  

Yeah and look what its bringing us.

2018-10-31 04:45:30 UTC  

Did I choose the wrong time to go take a shower?

2018-10-31 04:45:37 UTC  

I missed some drama XD

2018-10-31 04:45:38 UTC  

maybe?

2018-10-31 04:45:38 UTC  

@Undead Mockingbird I don't dispute for one minute that there is anything but bias towards women

2018-10-31 04:45:42 UTC  

Title 9

2018-10-31 04:45:47 UTC  

Yes, of course people can be treated equally in one regard and unequal in another.

I do not know who is denying that.

2018-10-31 04:45:48 UTC  

Any recap?

2018-10-31 04:46:01 UTC  

Alright well I'm not denying that.

2018-10-31 04:46:05 UTC  

loads of men being dragged through the mud in courts and the court of public opinion

2018-10-31 04:46:18 UTC  

Yeah I'm not against that either Tritrium.

2018-10-31 04:46:24 UTC  

I'm not denying this.

2018-10-31 04:46:28 UTC  

who should vote, feminism, and women's rights

2018-10-31 04:46:30 UTC  

It is also hard to say, on the total balance of things, if men or women had it better or worse historically.

2018-10-31 04:46:44 UTC  

I dont argue that poor people shouldnt be able to vote because less responsability

2018-10-31 04:46:44 UTC  

that's as far as I know

2018-10-31 04:47:00 UTC  

One would have to assign a metric to every way in which men and women were unequal and add that all up somehow.

It's a tiring point scoring exercise.

2018-10-31 04:47:11 UTC  

No one should vote, it's a farce, true feminism won decades ago, current feminism is a farce, and women already have equal rights which were won when feminism was relevant. Ba'am.

2018-10-31 04:47:20 UTC  

However, nowadays, the only laws that still remain gendered, on paper, almost exclusively favor women.

2018-10-31 04:47:22 UTC  

Bam

2018-10-31 04:47:54 UTC  

Rights are simply rights. End of story. The responsibility around them are another story of complete inequality which I agree with you.

2018-10-31 04:47:54 UTC  

And the laws that put men and women equal are usually tilted in favor of women like crazy.