Congress people have no stake in the effects of their decisions

and people that don't participate in the public aspects of the system don't notice the effect of forfeiting their stake until AFTER the mob has assembled, changed the laws and is coming for their shit

@RyeNorth

Day of the rake

https://cdn.discordapp.com/emojis/678997841581965314.gif?v=1

@Steyr "Thick" Shotgun https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/448320579498410004/687673117690036370/w9bbcwxpjco31.png

Man I wish transformers didn't get ruined

i like transformers :c

lol

as a random comment that was admittingly pretty funny

@Steyr "Thick" Shotgun That's because you're a trans form

Bazinga xD

Hella

Again D:

Man

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/577152869153898519/686964285200793643/lifeofcheems.mp4

Every time

🦠

a classic

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/669683392857767956/674716551114653731/78600932_152638129439709_8951446204103210991_n.mp4

when the autistic kid hasn't washed his hands with soap for 20 seconds

God I love phase 4.

Even in death, I serve the omnissiah.

So OKC asks this stupid question:
*"Which would you rather lose, the right to vote or the right to bear arms?"* <:thunk:462282216467333140>

Neither I aint conceding shit

this is a stupid question. The right to bear arms is precisely what protects your right to vote.

someone who has arms and the will to use them, is not going to lose their right to vote without a fight. and only an idiot with no sense of self-preservation would vote away their rights to bear arms.

logically, if someone was in a state of having one without the other, the vote can be much more easily regained with the threat of using arms, then the right to bear arms could be regained with a toothless vote.

Duh

I mean, the vote was *won* with arms *in the first place*