Message from @Mersenne
Discord ID: 688462359525982255
that had an effect
that actually accomplished things
Imagine my shock, in the face of overwhelming odds, they still fought.
Even the Warsaw Uprising.
Jesus lost all his followers for fighting because they chickened out
But noooo, Christ was justified in being a cuck because resistance is edgy.
and guess what?
it isn't resistance if you're harmless
Cucks led by a deified cuck.
1 man is harmless against a roman army
Christcucks on suicide watch.
salty much?
1 man started the First World War
Christianity is big dick energy
1 man is enough
Luci would know, ~~she~~ he has a 2 foot long BBC
1 man started the most successful religion in the world
by being righteous to the end, and keeping his character pure
believe it or not, you *don't* fight every battle that you can be presented with
alright it's pizza time
believe it or not, there are times for fighting, and times for peace
I WENT OUT AND GOT A 12 PACK OF PAPER TOWELS
I CALL THIS AN ABSOLUTE WIN
if Jesus went on fighting, he would've inspired nobody
and because he showed the absolute pinnacle of character
he allowed for the most successful religion in the world to take hold
you literally *cannot* argue with results
Crucifixion isn't very peaceful, is it? and surrendering to the enemy, that will execute you, whilst it may be peaceful, isn't very morally justifiable is it?
Surrender is dependent on context
Surrendering without a fight is cucking.
The idea that people can do the most horrible things to you, and you still don't have hatred against them, is morally justifiable
surrendering is by definition "without a fight"
idk what kind of English you're accustomed to
coolitic
> The idea that people can do the most horrible things to you, and you still don't have hatred against them, is morally justifiable
@Coolitic No, it's cuckoldry. It's weakness. It's cowardice.
you can surrender after a fight
cherck germany
2 wars in a row