Message from @zutt
Discord ID: 507613751768383519
she was on freedom
Oh cool.
they have a diagram of the exposure room on that study
each rats room get cable
there is a squirrel on the right of the video ( fox news video )
No shit
:\
Diet
Irradiated NIH-07 rodent wafer diet (perinatal phase) or irradiated NTP-2000 rodent wafer diet (prechronic phase) (Zeigler Brothers, Inc., Gardners, PA), available ad libitum, glass jars changed weekly
MmmMMMmmm....
Water
Tap water (Chicago municipal supply) via an adapted automatic watering system (SE Lab Group, Cincinnati, OH)
Confirmed: Chicago tap water causes cancer
...
Holy shit.
How many people work at google?
yeah, started in singapore apparently
I can't understand why people are like this...
I seriously can't understand this type of thinking.
The University of Oxford report also found that social media users were more apt to share “junk news” than what researchers considered “professional content,” which includes news from established media outlets and information from the government, academics or political candidates. What’s more, the report concluded that the kind of junk news once relatively contained to people on the far right is now being readily shared by mainstream political conservatives.
😏
Another oxford uni study
😄
For instance, the study classified Breitbart — a far-right news site once led by President Trump’s former adviser Stephen K. Bannon — as junk news. Stories on Breitbart, Howard said, fit at least three of the five “junk news criteria,” which include failing to meet the standards and best practices of professional journalism, using emotionally driven language, and relying on false information or conspiracy theories, highly biased reporting or counterfeit of established news outlets.
😏
...
I feel sorry for her.
But Twitter pushed back on some of the classifications for junk news that the researchers made. Many Americans consider Breitbart a legitimate news outlet. The company defended its decision not to ban all the links the researchers classified as junk as it touted its broader efforts to combat disinformation online.
T_T
So if i get that right
The oxford researchers
Decided which sites are truth sites
And which are junk news
And said the junk news should be banned
🤣
Very nice
OU has proven it's self to be infected and anything that comes out of it can be consider not worth reading or not worth trusting.
Well i think its worth reading so you know what to avoid
Also