this is nothing more than a company refusing to provide a service
@Exiled Sentinel as long as they dont use force
yeah I don't know wtf
Andy is fail
it's probably maple leaf interwebs
The joos
plus you cant control everything
lol
They can legally do that, but the service that they are refusing will have varying ethical outcomes
Adolf get to work
depending upon what it is they are blocking
TWEET IT OUT
I think it's ethical to do what you want with your property, but if you're working against Western values then on a consumer/business relationship end you should get dinged Ultimately that's up to the consumer though
@Blackhawk342 they never violated anyones rights which are what my ethics are based on
come on guys lol lets be oligarchs lol
You keep saying that. But you haven’t proven anything. Do you really think that nothing negative will come about due to googles natural monopoly?
20 year term limit
@Beemann values are morality though
i rather have Imperialism Walsp 😉
Phew its back up
You support googles censorship because you agree that what it’s censoring is bad. That’s it.
alright Wol
lets make some Heirs
@Exiled Sentinel they havent created a monopoly and without google you wouldnt be on their site or use their products
I need a cigarette
Yes, and the consumer can and should make moral decisions in their transactions
I retweeted it adolf
and probably drugs
Gives Lighter
this shit is depressing
@Exiled Sentinel I dont support it but I support the right to do it
If all you do is undermine your values with your wallet you'll find that they eventually disappear
It makes them a publisher.
?
Check and mate; they are fucked
That gif is fucked lol
@Existence is identity I never said it was illegal. Do you only see morality in shades of legal and illegal? Are you that autistic?
Are all legal acts good?
