hilariously

With systematic gun and weapon ownership, self defense classes, etc. the strength differential between men and women would matter far less. Feminist and many women don't want that, because it robs them of victimhood.

Men's weakness is their pretense of strength, women's strength is their pretense of weakness.

@Undead Mockingbird funny thing is, they catch this travelling mom, and this clean cut boy with an empty magazine and they're all "we will not apologize for enforcing the law!"

but in NY, the same people _refuse to enforce the law_ when it comes to immigration.

Yes, that kind of hypocrisy drives me mad.

if they can't be arbitrarily lenient about honest mistakes which could not have come as more of a surprise to those making them; surely they can't be lenient about federal law regarding residency.

I mean, seriously

there is sorta a standard in criminal law

I would actually feel safer if women systematically owned guns, because then it would be harder for them to claim victimhood.

"He raped you? Why didn't you shoot him?"

I think everyone should be trained and armed

that having taken all reasonable precautions, and having caused no harm, and having consulted the authorities at every step of the way

more or less should mean that you are not criminally liable

Women's biggest women right now is victimhood. If we could actually put their safety into their hands, where it belongs, men could relax.

It's not even negligence or undue ignorance that got these people

they just could not possibly imagine, even having read the statute, that they would be subject to it.

I keep getting called a misogynist, but I am the first one who would be for arming women.

I am not your white knight, I'm not your beta provider.

Here is a resume template, here is a gun - go out there and leave me alone.

lol

Oi, ave you got a license for that consistent principle?

I would rather arm women to the teeth, complete with every rape whistle or panic button, then to have to go full on Mike Pence rule to avoid some finger pointing.

If I see you out here advocating that people should be empowered to effect positive change in their lives, I'll have you in the wagon in no time flat.

now SCRAM

I would actually feel much safer if women drove around in tanks than if they can use their fake victimhood. A rape allegation is more dangerous to me than an armored vehicle - and I mean that.

You cannot destroy a Supreme Court nomination with a AR-15 - but you can with a false rape allegation dating back 35 years.

I agree, post-hughes fully-automatic PDWs for every lady with functioning eyes and a clean criminal record

Right.

Well, looks like we agree: Let's just fund rocket powered exo-suits for women so they can never fucking claim to be a victim again.

They'd campaign to have them destroyed, you know that.

Exactly.

Which brings me back to my point: They do not care about safety. They WANT victimhood, which is why they campaign against everything that would put the onus on THEM.

They don't want consent forms or video recordings, because then they can't cry rape later.

It's oppressive to have to go to the police - because reasons.

well, it is what it is

be the change yadda yadda

have some sons and daughters to teach the difference between cowardice and glory.

Yes, I'll be the damn change. I will do everything I can to resist this system.

don't waste your energy resisting the system

just be good to people who haven't been touched by it.

so that they emerge on your side.

I will not fucking mentor women, I will not be with them in an elevator, I will not donate to some feminist fuckwit organization, I will not wear a pussy hat, and I will pay as little tax as possible to a government that systematically funds the smearing of men.