I would rather arm women to the teeth, complete with every rape whistle or panic button, then to have to go full on Mike Pence rule to avoid some finger pointing.

If I see you out here advocating that people should be empowered to effect positive change in their lives, I'll have you in the wagon in no time flat.

now SCRAM

I would actually feel much safer if women drove around in tanks than if they can use their fake victimhood. A rape allegation is more dangerous to me than an armored vehicle - and I mean that.

You cannot destroy a Supreme Court nomination with a AR-15 - but you can with a false rape allegation dating back 35 years.

I agree, post-hughes fully-automatic PDWs for every lady with functioning eyes and a clean criminal record

Right.

Well, looks like we agree: Let's just fund rocket powered exo-suits for women so they can never fucking claim to be a victim again.

They'd campaign to have them destroyed, you know that.

Exactly.

Which brings me back to my point: They do not care about safety. They WANT victimhood, which is why they campaign against everything that would put the onus on THEM.

They don't want consent forms or video recordings, because then they can't cry rape later.

It's oppressive to have to go to the police - because reasons.

well, it is what it is

be the change yadda yadda

have some sons and daughters to teach the difference between cowardice and glory.

Yes, I'll be the damn change. I will do everything I can to resist this system.

don't waste your energy resisting the system

just be good to people who haven't been touched by it.

so that they emerge on your side.

I will not fucking mentor women, I will not be with them in an elevator, I will not donate to some feminist fuckwit organization, I will not wear a pussy hat, and I will pay as little tax as possible to a government that systematically funds the smearing of men.

Well, I found a middle ground: I just record everything

I will not fuck them sam i am

that way you get to not be a complete stranger to every woman

Where is your recording from 35 years ago?

hmm? I'm only 21 years of age

Also, that might be illegal in two party consent states.

Honestly, why didnt you record it 35 years ago?

And there are now rape shield laws that exclude some evidence like that.

I have a recording of every workplace conversation and meeting I have ever attended

Because you know you have something to hide?

THere is also C-51 in Canada, where you have to disclose to the prosecution what you are going to use to defend yourself, so they can poke holes in that.

except ones which contain certain forms of confidential information which I have signed agreements to destroy.

Soon, even recording everything won't help you anymore.

You are accused - off to the Gulag with you!

in some of those cases, I have been able to petition the _companies_ to retain the records

Oh certainly

my materials will not be adequate in a human rights tribunal

THere have been several cases in which evidence that owuld have exonerated a convicted man were excluded from the exhibits during court cases.

The guy sat in prison for ELEVEN years and they KNEW he was innocent.

I need to escape Canada ASAP