Yeah, I agree with that. They're called the great equalizer for a reason. All these women talking about how scared they are to walk down the street? Imagine how scared someone would be to mess with you if every woman in the world carried a handgun.
All that this shows me is that what's really important is to retain VICTIMHOOD STATUS. Because victimhood is far more powerful than being empowered and left to your own devices. If you do not have victimhood, you are on your own - and feminists don't want that.
That is also why they oppose gun ownership, self defense, basic awareness of surroundings, or means to defend yourself. It's not about being safe - it's about using your guise of weakness as a political cudgel.
With systematic gun and weapon ownership, self defense classes, etc. the strength differential between men and women would matter far less. Feminist and many women don't want that, because it robs them of victimhood.
@Undead Mockingbird funny thing is, they catch this travelling mom, and this clean cut boy with an empty magazine and they're all "we will not apologize for enforcing the law!"
if they can't be arbitrarily lenient about honest mistakes which could not have come as more of a surprise to those making them; surely they can't be lenient about federal law regarding residency.
I would rather arm women to the teeth, complete with every rape whistle or panic button, then to have to go full on Mike Pence rule to avoid some finger pointing.
I would actually feel much safer if women drove around in tanks than if they can use their fake victimhood. A rape allegation is more dangerous to me than an armored vehicle - and I mean that.
Which brings me back to my point: They do not care about safety. They WANT victimhood, which is why they campaign against everything that would put the onus on THEM.
