Message from @Kris
Discord ID: 510771085554483211
The two are not mutually exclusive. I know that the statistics show that blacks commit far more crime than white people. But that does not mean I want different due process for whites and blacks.
no conscious concept required
They were moving
There wasn't Ethnonationalism, cuz Ethnonationalism is a design
In the past people didn't care much for having an ethno-nation
All the time
the celts stayed put
Whole ethnicities
Whoever commits an evil deed should be opposed. But that should be based on the deed, not who commits it.
For example
Oh wait, weren't the US an Ethnostate until ~60 Years ago??
Look at valachian migration
@zutt There are some codes in he manusmriti, a book of Dravidian law, that require every new immigrant's familial background to be proved before they could work or stay.
depends on what you define an ethnostate really
in % of the same race
That was southern india
and then divide the sub-races ofc
@Jasse if you don't like mass migration, you just don't like mass migration
we don't either
ITS ALL JEWS
great job, buddy, what next?
and you opposite it with out opposing people doing it.
Yes, okay. That doesn't change what action we'd have to take.
when you make it about the DQ nobody wants to work with you on anything
The final solution?
Sure in some countries migrants were second class cotizens in history
We'd have to oppose mass migration, regardless of who pushes it.
and you make people who are concerned about mass migration look worse by association
literally no one here, is FOR mass-migration
But it was far from closed borders
As some alt right thinkers believe
@zutt mass migrants usually considered much worse than small groups of outsiders, from what I've seen
we all oppose generally the same things, but we don't attribute it to "Evil Joo's"
It varied a lot
Some kings encouraged it
For example czechs invoted german setlers over